Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Accurate Assessment of β-Cell Function

Bergman, Richard N., Ader, Marilyn, Huecking, Katrin, Van Citters, Gregg·2002·Diabetes

Abstract

Only in the last decade did modeling studies predict, and knockout experiments confirm, that type 2 diabetes is a “2-hit” disease in which insulin resistance is necessarily accompanied by β-cell defect(s) preventing the compensatory upregulation of insulin secretion. This long- delayed insight was associated with the development of a constant, the “disposition index,” describing the β-cell sensitivity-secretion relationship as a rectangular hyperbola. Shifts in insulin sensitivity are accompanied by compensatory alterations in β-cell sensitivity to glucose. Insulin-sensitive subjects do not require a massive insulin response to exogenous glucose to maintain a normal blood glucose. But if their insulin sensitivity decreases by 80%, as in late pregnancy, they need a fivefold greater insulin response to achieve an identical disposition index. Women with gestational diabetes have an insulin response similar to that of normal volunteers; at first glance, this suggests similar islet function, but the utility of the disposition index is to normalize this response to the amplitude of third trimester insulin resistance, revealing severe β-cell deficiency. The index is a quantitative, convenient, and accurate tool in analyzing epidemiologic data and identifying incipient impaired glucose tolerance. Separate major issues remain, however: the causes of insulin resistance, the causes of the failure of adequate β-cell compensation in type 2 diabetes, and the nature of the signal(s) from insulin-resistant tissues that fail to elicit the appropriate β-cell increment in sensitivity to glucose and other stimuli. The disposition index is likely to remain the most accurate physiologic measure for testing hypotheses and solutions to these challenges in whole organisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s212

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Bergman, R. N., Ader, M., Huecking, K., & Van Citters, G.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
51
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
S212-S220
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2162344377
Cited by
516
References
8
FWCI
18.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate Assessment of β-Cell Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s212
The paper
Bergman, R. N., Ader, M., Huecking, K., & Van Citters, G. (2002). Accurate Assessment of β-Cell Function. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s212

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.