Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 249

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Diabetes

Open access
Schmidt, Reinhold, Launer, Lenore J., Nilsson, Lars-Göran, Pajak, Andrzej, Sans, Susanna, Berger, Klaus, Breteler, Monique M., de Ridder, Maria, Dufouil, Carole, Fuhrer, Rebecca, Giampaoli, Simona, Hofman, Albert, for the CASCADE Consortium·2004·Diabetes

Abstract

Diabetic patients are at increased risk for stroke, but little is known about the presence of other brain lesions. We studied the association of magnetic resonance imaging–detected brain lesions to diabetes in 1,252 individuals aged 65–75 years who were randomly selected from eight European population registries or defined working populations. All scans were centrally read for brain abnormalities, including infarcts, white matter lesions, and atrophy. We used a three-point scale to rate periventricular white matter lesions, and the volume of subcortical lesions was calculated according to their number and size. Subjective grading of cortical atrophy by lobe and summation of the lobar grades resulted in a total cortical atrophy score. The mean of three linear measurements of the ventricular diameter relative to the intracranial cavity defined the severity of subcortical atrophy. After adjustment for possible confounders, diabetes was associated with cortical brain atrophy but not with any focal brain lesions or subcortical atrophy. There was a strong interaction of diabetes and hypertension, such that the association between diabetes and cortical atrophy existed only in hypertensive but not in normotensive participants. Cognitive and pathological data are needed to determine the clinical significance of these findings as well as to understand the mechanisms underlying these associations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.53.3.687

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 249

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, R., Launer, L. J., Nilsson, L.-G., Pajak, A., Sans, S., Berger, K., Breteler, M. M., de Ridder, M., Dufouil, C., Fuhrer, R., Giampaoli, S., Hofman, A., & for the CASCADE Consortium
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
687-692
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2168719442
Cited by
249
References
4
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.53.3.687
The paper
Schmidt, R., Launer, L. J., Nilsson, L.-G., Pajak, A., Sans, S., Berger, K., Breteler, M. M., de Ridder, M., Dufouil, C., Fuhrer, R., Giampaoli, S., Hofman, A., & for the CASCADE Consortium. (2004). Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Diabetes. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.53.3.687

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.