Cited by 369Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

NIDDM and Blood Pressure as Risk Factors for Poor Cognitive Performance: The Framingham Study

Elias, Penelope K, Elias, Merrill F, D'Agostino, Ralph B, Cupples, L Adrienne, Wilson, Peter W, Silbershatz, Halit, Wolf, Philip A·1997·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if NIDDM and blood pressure are risk factors for poor cognitive performance and if history and duration of NIDDM and blood pressure interact such that the risk of poor performance is greater for subjects with both NIDDM and hypertension. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a large prospective cohort sample with 187 NIDDM subjects and 1,624 nondiabetic subjects who were followed for 28–30 years. Cognitive function was assessed using eight tests of learning, memory, visual organization, verbal fluency attention, concept formation, and abstract reasoning. A composite score was also calculated. Odds ratios were used to estimate the relative risk of performing below the lower 25th percentile of z scores on these tests. RESULTS: NIDDM and blood pressure interacted such that diagnosis and duration of NIDDM were associated with greater risk of poor performance on tests of visual memory and on the composite score for hypertensive subjects. Duration of NIDDM was associated with increased risk for poor performance on tests of verbal memory and concept formation. Insulin-treated NIDDM subjects were at higher risk for poor cognitive performance than those NIDDM subjects treated with oral agents or diet. Blood pressure level was associated independently with a measure of verbal fluency. CONCLUSIONS: History and duration of NIDDM and high blood pressure are significant risk factors for poor cognitive performance. Hypertensive people with NIDDM are at greatest risk for poor performance on tests measuring visual organization and memory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.20.9.1388

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elias, P. K., Elias, M. F., D'Agostino, R. B., Cupples, L. A., Wilson, P. W., Silbershatz, H., & Wolf, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • University of Maine (US)
  • Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Consulting Unit, Boston University Boston, Massachusetts
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1997-09-01
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
1388-1395
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2057702509
Cited by
368
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (5-R37-AG03055-14, R37AG003055, 2-R01-AG08122-07, R01-AG0646-02, R01AG008122)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, hypertension, blood pressure, cognitive performance, cognitive decline, risk factors, diabetes duration, insulin therapy, oral antidiabetic drugs, visual memory, verbal memory, verbal fluency, Framingham Heart Study
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review