Cited by 169Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and ResearchCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Impaired Glucose Tolerance, but not Impaired Fasting Glucose, Is Associated With Increased Levels of Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors

Blake, Deirdre R., Meigs, James B., Muller, Denis C., Najjar, Samer S., Andres, Reubin, Nathan, David M.·2004·Diabetes

Abstract

Impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) identify individuals at high risk for progression to diabetes. Whether IFG and IGT have comparable coronary heart disease (CHD) risk factor profiles, independent of their progression to diabetes, is unclear. We determined CHD risk factor levels in 937 nondiabetic individuals at baseline and biannually over a mean follow-up period of 9.5 years. Subjects had no known CHD at baseline and had ≥2 (mean 4.2) oral glucose tolerance tests during follow-up. We classified glucose tolerance categories using American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria or modified criteria that redefined IFG as 100–126 mg/dl, creating a similar baseline prevalence of IFG and IGT. Subjects who developed diabetes during follow-up were excluded from our analysis. Baseline CHD risk factors were similar in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and IFG, but significantly more atherogenic in those with IGT or IFG + IGT. These findings were unchanged when the modified criteria were used, suggesting that IGT is phenotypically different from IFG and is associated with increased levels of CHD risk factors. Subjects with isolated IFG had similar levels of CHD risk factors as NGT subjects, even when IFG was redefined with a lower threshold. Although CHD risk factors were increased in the IGT group, the incidence of CHD events was not significantly different among groups, perhaps owing to the limited number of events. The differences in CHD risk factors among prediabetic groups may have clinical implications for screening strategies and CHD risk stratification of individuals with IFG and IGT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.53.8.2095

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blake, D. R., Meigs, J. B., Muller, D. C., Najjar, S. S., Andres, R., & Nathan, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Institute on Aging (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2004-08-01
Volume
53
Issue
8
Pages
2095-2100
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2147726927
Cited by
169
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
impaired glucose tolerance, impaired fasting glucose, coronary risk factors, prediabetes, atherogenic risk factors, non-diabetic individuals, coronary heart disease incidence, cardiovascular risk stratification, prediabetes screening
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Blood Glucose, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Disease, Fasting, Follow-Up Studies, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Social Class, Time Factors, Baltimore, Body Mass Index, Glucose Intolerance, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review