The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Body mass index, diabetes, and C-reactive protein among U.S. adults.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The author examined the relationship between C-reactive protein and BMI and diabetes status among 16,573 participants aged > or = 20 years of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study had a cross-sectional design. RESULTS: Geometric mean concentrations of C-reactive protein were lowest among individuals with a BMI < 18.5 kg/m2 and increased with increasing BMI categories. Restricting the analysis to participants without various medical conditions did not change the relation. After adjusting for age, sex, race or ethnicity, and education, using logistic regression analysis, odds ratios for an elevated C-reactive protein concentration (> or = 85th percentile of the sex-specific C-reactive protein concentration distribution) among participants with a BMI of 25 to < 30, 30 to < 35, 35 to < 40, and > or = 40 kg/m2 were 1.51 (95% CI 1.23-1.86), 3.19 (2.60-3.91), 6.11 (4.67-7.98), and 9.30 (6.43-13.46), respectively, compared with participants with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. C-reactive protein concentrations were lowest among those individuals without diabetes or with impaired fasting glucose and highest among those with newly or previously diagnosed diabetes. Compared with participants with a normal fasting glucose, participants with impaired fasting glucose, newly diagnosed diabetes, and previously diagnosed diabetes had 0.99 (0.72-1.37), 1.84 (1.25-2.71), and 1.59 (1.25-2.01) odds of having an elevated C-reactive protein concentration after adjustment for age, sex, race or ethnicity, education, and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm cross-sectional findings from previous studies that show elevated C-reactive protein concentrations among individuals who are obese or have diabetes. The implications of these findings, however, remain unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Pradhan, A. D. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.3.327 · Cited by 4,433
C-reactive protein: a critical update
Pepys, M. B., & Hirschfield, G. M. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200318921 · Cited by 3,436
Inflammation and Activated Innate Immunity in the Pathogenesis of Type 2 Diabetes
Pickup, J. C. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.3.813 · Cited by 1,414
Ridker, P. M. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.103.13.1813 · Cited by 1,402
Insulin Resistance and Chronic Cardiovascular Inflammatory Syndrome
Fernández-Real, J. M., & Ricart, W. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0010 · Cited by 886
Metadata
- Authors
- Ford, E. S.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1999-12-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1971-1977
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2120758327
- Cited by
- 644
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Body mass index, diabetes, and C-reactive protein among U.S. adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.22.12.1971
- The paper
- Ford, E. S. (1999). Body mass index, diabetes, and C-reactive protein among U.S. adults. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.12.1971
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.