The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk of Developing Retinopathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Good or Poor Metabolic Control
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The study goal was to assess and predict the risk of developing retinopathy in type 1 diabetic patients with extreme metabolic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Based on material from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) study (n = 1,441 patients), patients without retinopathy at baseline (DCCT primary cohort) were considered under good or poor metabolic control if the mean HbA1c level (until the last visit) fell in the lower or upper 20% of the overall HbA1c distribution, respectively. Retinopathy was recorded as either absent or present. Logistic regression was used to predict retinopathy from covariates used in the DCCT retinopathy study. RESULTS—Among the 153 DCCT patients with “good metabolic control” (mean HbA1c ≤6.87%), three-step change retinopathy developed in 15 (9.8%), and 138 (90%) remained free of retinopathy. Conversely, among the 166 patients with “poor metabolic control” (mean HbA1c ≥9.49%), the complication did not develop in 71 (43%) and did develop in 95 (57%). Whereas occurrence of diabetic retinopathy was primarily due to metabolic control (P < 0.0001) and duration of participation in the study (P < 0.0001), two other covariates were found to be significant prognostic factors of the complication: HbA1c at baseline (OR 1.37, P < 0.001) and BMI (OR 1.11, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS—This study confirms that retinopathy develops in ∼10% of patients with type 1 diabetes under good metabolic control, whereas >40% of patients with type 1 diabetes remain free of retinopathy despite poor metabolic control. After adjusting for metabolic control and duration of participation in the study, it was found that previous glycemic exposure (HbA1c) and BMI may provide a possible explanation to such paradoxical clinical situations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1995) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.44.8.968 · Cited by 1,301
Pirart, J. (1978) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.1.3.168 · Cited by 1,290
Cited by
Sjølie, A. K., Klein, R., Porta, M., Orchard, T., Fuller, J., Parving, H. H., Bilous, R., & Chaturvedi, N. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61411-7 · Cited by 435
Diabetic retinopathy management guidelines
Chakrabarti, R., Harper, C. A., & Keeffe, J. E. (2012) · Expert Review of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1586/eop.12.52 · Cited by 112
Prevalence and healthcare costs of diabetic retinopathy: a population-based register study in Sweden
Heintz, E., Wiréhn, A.-B., Peebo, B. B., Rosenqvist, U., & Levin, L.-Å. (2010) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-010-1836-3 · Cited by 107
RISK FACTORS FOR PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN A LATINO AMERICAN POPULATION
Nittala, M. G., Keane, P. A., Zhang, K., & Sadda, S. R. (2014) · Retina · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000000117 · Cited by 55
Giloyan, A., Harutyunyan, T., & Petrosyan, V. (2015) · BMC Ophthalmology · doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0032-0 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, L., Krzentowski, G., Albert, A., & Lefebvre, P. J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2001-07-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1275-1279
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2137800641
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Developing Retinopathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Good or Poor Metabolic Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.24.7.1275
- The paper
- Zhang, L., Krzentowski, G., Albert, A., & Lefebvre, P. J. (2001). Risk of Developing Retinopathy in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Type 1 Diabetic Patients With Good or Poor Metabolic Control. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.7.1275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.