Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 609

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
American Diabetes Association·2003·Diabetes Care

Abstract

iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications.Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed.A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes.These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested persons with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care.While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided.These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed.For more detailed information, refer to Skyler (Ed.):Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1) and Zimmerman (Ed.):Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2).The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes.A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations.The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s33

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 92 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Skyler JS (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes. 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1998
  2. Zimmerman BR (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes. 4th ed. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 1998
  3. Jovanovic L (Ed.): Medical Management of Pregnancy Complicated by Diabetes. 3rd ed. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 2000
  4. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group: Techniques for scatter and local photocoagulation treatment of diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report no. 3. Int Ophthalmol Clin 27:254–264, 1987 · doi:10.1097/00004397-198702740-00005
  5. American Diabetes Association: Immunization and the prevention of influenza and pneumococcal disease in people with diabetes (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 26(Suppl. 1):S126–S128, 2003 · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s126

Cited by

See all 609

Metadata

Authors
American Diabetes Association
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2003-01-01
Volume
26
Issue
suppl_1
Pages
s33-s50
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4230518743
Cited by
609
References
92
FWCI
43.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s33
The paper
American Diabetes Association. (2003). Standards of Medical Care for Patients With Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.2007.s33

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.