The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vitamin D and Calcium Intake in Relation to Type 2 Diabetes in Women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine the association between vitamin D and calcium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In the Nurses’ Health Study, we followed 83,779 women who had no history of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or cancer at baseline for the development of type 2 diabetes. Vitamin D and calcium intake from diet and supplements was assessed every 2–4 years. During 20 years of follow-up, we documented 4,843 incident cases of type 2 diabetes. RESULTS—After adjusting for multiple potential confounders, there was no association between total vitamin D intake and type 2 diabetes. However, the relative risk (RR) of type 2 diabetes was 0.87 (95% CI 0.75–1.00; P for trend = 0.04) comparing the highest with the lowest category of vitamin D intake from supplements. The multivariate RRs of type 2 diabetes were 0.79 (0.70–0.90; P for trend <0.001) comparing the highest with the lowest category of calcium intake from all sources and 0.82 (0.72–0.92; P for trend <0.001) comparing the highest with the lowest category of calcium intake from supplements. A combined daily intake of >1,200 mg calcium and >800 IU vitamin D was associated with a 33% lower risk of type 2 diabetes with RR of 0.67 (0.49–0.90) compared with an intake of <600 mg and 400 IU calcium and vitamin D, respectively. CONCLUSIONS— The results of this large prospective study suggest a potential beneficial role for both vitamin D and calcium intake in reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
American Diabetes Association (2005) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.28.suppl_1.s37 · Cited by 830
Lawlor, D. A., Smith, G. D., Bruckdorfer, K. R., Kundu, D., & Ebrahim, S. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16260-0 · Cited by 438
Feskanich, D., Willett, W. C., & Colditz, G. A. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.2.504 · Cited by 358
Self-citation
Cited by
Holick, M. F. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra070553 · Cited by 13,720
Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons from Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice
Bouillon, R., Carmeliet, G., Verlinden, L., van Etten, E., Verstuyf, A., Luderer, H. F., Lieben, L., Mathieu, C., & Demay, M. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0004 · Cited by 1,783
Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.24494 · Cited by 1,156
Autier, P. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.16.1730 · Cited by 1,104
Vitamin D-effects on skeletal and extraskeletal health and the need for supplementation
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5010111 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittas, A. G., Dawson-Hughes, B., Li, T., Van Dam, R. M., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., & Hu, F. B.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2006-03-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 650-656
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2096717361
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 24.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.