The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDM
Abstract
Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetic individuals and health professionals often assume that the symptoms of extremely low or high blood glucose (BG) levels can be recognized and, consequently, appropriate treatment decisions can be based on symptom perception. Because no research has documented the validity of these assumptions, this study tested the ability to perceive BG concentration. Nineteen type I adults, experienced in self-monitoring of BG (SMBG), estimated their BG 40–54 times just before measurement of actual BG. This procedure was repeated under two conditions: (1) in the hospital (hospital condition) while connected to an insulin/glucose infusion system that artificially manipulated BG, leaving subjects only symptomatic, or internal, cues and (2) in the natural environment (home condition), where both internal and external cues, e.g., food and insulin consumption, were available. Estimates significantly correlated with actual BG for 7 of 16 subjects in the hospital condition and for 18 of 19 subjects in the home condition. Believed ability to estimate BG did not predict documented ability in either condition. An evaluation of the treatment significance of estimation errors showed that the majority of errors were relatively benign. The most common error affecting clinical outcome was estimated euglycemia when actual BG was hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Verbal Fluency and Naming Performance in Type I Diabetes at Different Blood Glucose Concentrations
Holmes, C. S., Koepke, K. M., Thompson, R. G., Gyves, P. W., & Weydert, J. A. (1984) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.7.5.454 · Cited by 97
Cited by
Somatic symptom reporting in women and men
Barsky, A. J., Peekna, H. M., & Borus, J. F. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016004266.x · Cited by 816
Parkes, J. L., Slatin, S. L., Pardo, S., & Ginsberg, B. H. (2000) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143 · Cited by 620
Glucose sensors: a review of current and emerging technology
Oliver, N. S., Toumazou, C., Cass, A. E. G., & Johnston, D. G. (2009) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02642.x · Cited by 584
Symptomatic Hypoglycaemia in 411 Type 1 Diabetic Patients
Pramming, S., Thorsteinsson, B., Bendtson, I., & Binder, C. (1991) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.1991.tb01575.x · Cited by 337
Evaluating the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose-Monitoring Sensors
Kovatchev, B. P., Gonder-Frederick, L. A., Cox, D. J., & Clarke, W. L. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.8.1922 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cox, D. J., Clarke, W. L., Gonder-Frederick, L., Pohl, S., Hoover, C., Snyder, A., Zimbelman, L., Carter, W. R., Bobbitt, S., & Pennebaker, J.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1985-11-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 529-536
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2073886055
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.8.6.529
- The paper
- Cox, D. J., Clarke, W. L., Gonder-Frederick, L., Pohl, S., Hoover, C., Snyder, A., Zimbelman, L., Carter, W. R., Bobbitt, S., & Pennebaker, J. (1985). Accuracy of Perceiving Blood Glucose in IDDM. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.8.6.529
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.