Cited by 69Diabetes Management and EducationPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsDiabetes Management and Research

Incorrect Insulin Administration: A Problem That Warrants Attention

Open access
Trief, Paula M., Cibula, Donald, Rodriguez, Elaine, Akel, Bridget, Weinstock, Ruth S.·2016·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

In Brief Incorrect administration of insulin (e.g., too little, too much, or at wrong times) can result in transient and serious hypo- and hyperglycemia, wide glycemic excursions, and diabetic ketoacidosis. The authors systematically assessed the insulin-related knowledge and injection skills of a sample of adults with diabetes and found that errors in self-administering insulin, including choosing an incorrect insulin dose, were common. Injection site selection and diabetes numeracy were also concerns. Correct timing of injections and confidence in choosing correct doses, but not skills scores, related to better A1C and blood glucose levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diaclin.34.1.25

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In most populations, approximately 20-30% of those with type 2 diabetes mellitus are taking insulin.

    “In most populations, approximately 20–30% of those with T2DM are taking insulin27,28.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract reports that approximately 31% of diabetes patients are treated with insulin, which is close to the claimed range. It does not give a 20–30% estimate specifically for people with type 2 diabetes or establish that the estimate holds in most populations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [2]Selvin E, Parrinello CM, Sacks DB, Coresh J Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988–1994 and 1999–2010. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 517– 525 24733192 PMC4442608
  2. [3]Gregg EW, Li Y, Wang J, Changes in diabetes-related complications in the United States, 1990–2010. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1514– 1523 24738668
  3. [4]Lipska KJ, Ross JS, Wang Y, National trends in U.S. hospital admissions for hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia among Medicare beneficiaries, 1999 to 2011. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 1116– 1124 24838229 PMC4152370
  4. [5]Weinstock RS, Xing D, Maahs DM,., for the T1D Exchange Clinic Network Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 3411– 3419 23760624
  5. [6]Bao J, Gilbertson HR, Gray R, Improving the estimation of mealtime insulin dose in adults with type 1 diabetes: the Normal Insulin Demand for Dose Adjustment (NIDDA) study. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 2146– 2151 21949219 PMC3177729
  6. [7]Geller AI, Shehab N, Lovegrove MC, National estimates of insulin-related hypoglycemia and errors leading to emergency department visits and hospitalizations. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 678– 686 24615164 PMC4631022
  7. [10]Weinger K, Butler HA, Welch GW, La Greca AM Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1346– 1352 15920050 PMC1615849
  8. [11]Cavanaugh K, Huizinga MM, Wallston KA, Association of numeracy and diabetes control. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148: 737– 746 18490687
  9. [12]Huizinga MM, Elasy TA, Wallston KA, Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT). BMC Health Serv Res 2008; 8: 96 18452617 PMC2390531
  10. [14]Weinger K, Beverly EA Barriers to achieving glycemic targets: who omits insulin and why? Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 450– 452 20103561 PMC2809300
  11. [15]Carmer JA, Pugh MJ The influence of insulin use on glycemic control: how well do adults follow prescriptions for insulin? Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 78– 83 15616237

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trief, P. M., Cibula, D., Rodriguez, E., Akel, B., & Weinstock, R. S.
Affiliations
  • State University of New York (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
Corresponding author
Trief, Paula M.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
25-33
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W2242208213
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Diabetes Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
insulin administration errors, self-injection, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, injection site selection, injection timing, HbA1c, diabetes self-management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review