Cited by 21Diabetes Management and EducationCommunity Health and DevelopmentHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Using peer power to reduce health disparities: implementation of a diabetes support coach program in federally qualified health centers.

Open access
Walker, Ashby F., Addala, Ananta, Sheehan, Eleni, Lal, Rayhan, Haller, Michael, Cuttriss, Nicholas, Filipp, Stephanie, Baer, Linda +10 more·2022·Diabetes Spectrum

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) provide vital support to underserved communities in the promotion of health equity by addressing barriers related to the social determinants of health that often prevent people living with diabetes from achieving optimal health outcomes. Peer support programs in diabetes can also offer people living with diabetes invaluable support through a shared understanding of the disease and by offsetting diabetes-related stigma. As part of a Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) Diabetes program, participating federally qualified healthcare centers were provided diabetes support coaches (DSCs) to facilitate patient engagement. DSCs hold invaluable expert knowledge, as they live with diabetes themselves and reside in areas they serve, thus combining the CHW role with peer support models. The use of DSCs and CHWs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and beyond is highly effective at reaching underserved communities with diabetes and promoting health equity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dsi22-0004

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, Long JA, Asch DA. Evidence- based community health worker program addresses unmet social needs and generates positive return on investment. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020;39:207-213

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, A. F., Addala, A., Sheehan, E., Lal, R., Haller, M., Cuttriss, N., Filipp, S., Baer, L., Gurka, M., Bernier, A., Figg, L., Westen, S., Hood, K., Anez-Zabala, C., Frank, E., Roque, X., Maizel, J., & Maahs, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • 6ECHO Diabetes Action Network, Chevy Chase, MD
Corresponding author
Walker, Ashby F.
Venue
Diabetes Spectrum
Published
2022-08-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
295-303
ISSN
  • 1040-9165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-7353
OpenAlex
W4291972357
Cited by
21
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Spectrum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  • University of Florida
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK122017, K23DK131342)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
community health workers, peer support, health disparities, health equity, federally qualified health centers, social determinants of health, diabetes stigma, patient engagement, ECHO program, underserved populations, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review