Cited by 95Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Pool exercise for patients with fibromyalgia or chronic widespread pain: A randomized controlled trial and subgroup analyses

Open access
Mannerkorpi, K, Nordeman, L, Ericsson, A, Arndorw, M, GAU Study Group·2009·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of pool exercise in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain and to determine characteristics influencing the effects of treatment. METHODS: A total of 134 women with fibromyalgia and 32 with chronic widespread pain were randomized to a 20-session pool exercise and a 6-session education programme or to a control group undertaking the same education programme. The primary outcomes were the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). FIQ Pain and other health variables were included. RESULTS: The FIQ total (p = 0.04) improved in the intervention group, with an effect size of 0.32. Patients who had participated in at least 60% of the exercise sessions improved in the FIQ total (effect size 0.44), the 6MWT (effect size 0.43) and FIQ Pain (effect size 0.69) compared with controls (p < 0.05). Long-term follow-up revealed lasting, but small, improvement (effect size < 0.29) in the 6MWT among the active participants (p < 0.05). Analyses within the subgroups showed that patients with milder stress, pain or depression improved most by treatment on the FIQ total (effect size > 0.50, p < 0.05) compared with controls. CONCLUSION: The exercise-education programme showed significant, but small, improvement in health status in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic widespread pain, compared with education only. Patients with milder symptoms improved most with this treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/16501977-0409

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mannerkorpi, K., Nordeman, L., Ericsson, A., Arndorw, M., & GAU Study Group
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2009
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
751-760
ISSN
1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082467301
Cited by
95
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, chronic widespread pain, aquatic exercise, Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, 6-minute walk test, medication adherence, subgroup analysis, depression, stress, pain intensity, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Chronic Disease, Exercise Therapy, Female, Fibromyalgia, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leisure Activities, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Swimming Pools, Treatment Outcome, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review