Cited by 393Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Systematic review with meta-analysis: The efficacy of probiotics in inflammatory bowel disease

Derwa, Y., Gracie, D. J., Hamlin, P. J., Ford, A. C.·2017·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Evidence implicates disturbances of the gastrointestinal microbiota in their pathogenesis. AIM: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of probiotics in IBD. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched (until November 2016). Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) recruited adults with UC or CD, and compared probiotics with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) or placebo. Dichotomous symptom data were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR) of failure to achieve remission in active IBD, or RR of relapse of disease activity in quiescent IBD, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The search identified 12 253 citations. Twenty-two RCTs were eligible. There was no benefit of probiotics over placebo in inducing remission in active UC (RR of failure to achieve remission=0.86; 95% CI=0.68-1.08). However, when only trials of VSL#3 were considered there appeared to be a benefit (RR=0.74; 95% CI=0.63-0.87). Probiotics appeared equivalent to 5-ASAs in preventing UC relapse (RR=1.02; 95% CI=0.85-1.23). There was no benefit of probiotics in inducing remission of active CD, in preventing relapse of quiescent CD, or in preventing relapse of CD after surgically induced remission. CONCLUSIONS: VSL#3 may be effective in inducing remission in active UC. Probiotics may be as effective as 5-ASAs in preventing relapse of quiescent UC. The efficacy of probiotics in CD remains uncertain, and more evidence from RCTs is required before their utility is known.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.14203

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some systematic reviews and meta-analyses have supported that specific probiotic strains may be effective in certain areas.

    “While there is limited evidence around many probiotics, some systematic reviews and meta-analyses have supported that specific strains may be effective in certain areas [43,44,45,46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derwa, Y., Gracie, D. J., Hamlin, P. J., & Ford, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Gracie, D. J.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-06-27
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
389-400
ISSN
  • 0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2036
OpenAlex
W2733524369
Cited by
393
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 8
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
probiotics, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, VSL#3, 5-aminosalicylates, remission induction, relapse prevention, quiescent disease, surgical remission, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Adult, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease, Humans, Remission Induction, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Mesalamine, Probiotics, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review