Cited by 11Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Blood Pressure Estimation Based on Photoplethysmography: Finger Versus Wrist

Open access
Paliakaite, Birute, Charlton, Peter H, Rapalis, Andrius, Plusciauskaite, Vilma, Piartli, Povilas, Kaniusas, Eugenijus, Marozas, Vaidotas·2021·2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)

Abstract

The photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal is an attractive candidate for unobtrusive blood pressure (BP) monitoring, as it is widely measured by wrist-worn devices. However, most studies of PPG-based BP estimation techniques have used finger PPG signals. This study compares PPG-based BP estimation when using finger and wrist optical sensors. Subject-specific linear regression models employing pulse transit time, PPG intensity ratio and heart rate as features for BP estimation were trained and tested using PPGs and reference continuous BP values obtained from 22 healthy participants performing 2 cold pressor tests.$Mean\pm stan$- dard deviation of differences, and the mean absolute difference between reference and estimated systolic BP values were:$0.47\pm 10.44$mmHg and 7.78 mmHg for finger PPG signals; and$1.05\pm 12.86$mmHg and 9.69 mmHg for wrist PPG signals. Increases and decreases in systolic BP of at least 10 mmHg were detected with F1 scores of: 0.81 and 0.76 for finger PPG; and 0.75 and 0.61 for wrist PPG. Models performed better with finger PPG signals. Different signal processing approaches were required for finger and wrist signals, indicating that finger-based BP estimation models should not be generalized directly to wrist PPGs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662716

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paliakaite, B., Charlton, P. H., Rapalis, A., Plusciauskaite, V., Piartli, P., Kaniusas, E., & Marozas, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Venue
2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-09-13
Pages
1-4
ISSN
2325-887X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205158800
Cited by
11
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.31
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computing in cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • KTUePubl (Repository of Kaunas University of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Regional Development Fund (01.2.2-LMT-K-718-01-0030)
  • Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)
  • British Heart Foundation (FS/20/20/34626)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
photoplethysmography, blood pressure estimation, finger PPG, pulse transit time, cold pressor test, systolic blood pressure, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, wearable sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review