Cited by 5Mining and Resource ManagementExtractivism and Socioeconomic IssuesPolitical Economy and Marxism

"Blood on the floor:" The nickel commodity frontier and inter-capitalist competition under green extractivism

Open access
Barbesgaard, Mads, Whitmore, Andy·2024·Journal of Political Ecology

Abstract

Major companies in the mining industry are strategizing to benefit from the expected rise in demand for energy "transition minerals" that underpin current technologies of decarbonization (such as batteries and wind turbines). This article elucidates their current strategies of accumulation through the case of BHP, the world's largest mining company. We draw on political ecology and commodity frontier theory in order to grapple with inter-capitalist competition under the current moment of green extractivism by examining firm and state practices in the nickel commodity frontier. Empirically, we examine the changing role that nickel has played in BHP's asset portfolio during the past decade where it has attempted to significantly accumulate from the expansion of the nickel commodity frontier. Yet, despite this centering of the expansion of the nickel commodity frontier for its particular strategy of accumulation under green extractivism, it has so far been unsuccessful. Given this potential for failure of company practices in commodity frontiers, we argue that green extractivism should not always and everywhere be seen as a story foretold.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2458/jpe.5458

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mining companies are seizing opportunities created by climate crisis to widen and deepen their control over new mineral frontiers.

    “demonstrating that mining companies are seizing the 'opportunities' created by the climate crisis to 'widen' and 'deepen' their control over new mineral frontiers.”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Barbesgaard and Whitmore (2024, this Section)

    The Introduction and “Expansion through commodity widening” describe mining companies pursuing transition-mineral opportunities, including BHP expanding nickel exploration and bringing new mines into production. But the Concluding remarks say BHP has sought to, yet generally failed to, accumulate significantly through expansion of the nickel frontier. The claim overstates that attempted expansion as companies successfully widening and deepening their control over mineral frontiers generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BHP has attempted and failed (until now) to benefit from rising demand for energy transition minerals.

    “the authors trace how BHP has attempted and failed (until now) to benefit from the rising demand for energy 'transition minerals' that underpins current technologies for decarbonization”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Barbesgaard and Whitmore (2024, this Section)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Andreucci, D., López, G. G., Radhuber I. M. et al. (2023). The coloniality of green extractivism: Unearthing decarbonization by dispossession through the case of nickel. Political Geography, 107, 102997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.102997 · DOI
  2. Baglioni, E. & Campling, L. (2017). Natural resource industries as global value chaines: Frontiers, fetishism, labour and the state. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 49(11), 2437-2456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17728517 · DOI
  3. Bernstein, H. & Campling, L. (2006). Commodity studies and commodity fetishism II: 'Profits with principles'? Journal of Agrarian Change, 6(3), 414-447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2006.00128.x BHP Billiton (2005a). Appendix 1: Conditions of the offer, Investor News https://www.bhp.com/- /media/bhp/documents/investors/news/nr_10_05_wmc.pdf BHP Billiton (2005b). BHP Billiton Announces USD 7.3 Billion Cash Offer for WMC Resources. 8 March https://www.bhp.com/news/media-centre/releases/2005/03/bhp-billiton-announces-us73-billion-cash- offer-for-wmc-resources BHP Billiton (2009). Changes to BHP Billiton's Nickel Business, 21 January (retrieved 5/11/22) http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/investorsMedia/news/2009/changesToBhpBillitonsNickelBusiness.jsp BHP (2018). Annual Report 2018. (retrieved from www.bhp.com 01/11/22) · DOI
  4. Bridge, G. (2000). The social regulation of resource access and environmental impact: Production, nature and contradiction in the US copper industry. Geoforum, 31, 237-256, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016- 7185(99)00046-9 · DOI
  5. Bruna, N. (2022). A climate-smart world and the rise of Green Extractivism. Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(4), 839-864, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2070482 · DOI
  6. Campling, L. (2012). The Tuna 'Commodity Frontier': Business strategies and environment in the industrial tuna fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (2-3), 252-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00354.x · DOI
  7. Campling, L. & Baglioni, E. (2020). The political economy of natural resources. In Kobayashi, A. (ed.) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2 nd ed.), (p. 259-266). Elsevier.
  8. Capps, G. (2016). Tribal-Landed property: The value of chieftancy in contemporary Africa. Journal of Agrarian Change, 16 (3), 452-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12179 · DOI
  9. Dunlap, A. & Jakobsen, J. (2020). The violent technologies of extraction: Political ecology, critical agrarian studies and the capitalist worldeater. Palgrave Pivot.
  10. Dunlap, A. & Riquito, M. (2023). Social warfare for lithium extraction? Open-pit lithium mining, counterinsurgency tactics and enforcing green extractivism in northern Portugal. Energy Research & Social Science 95(1): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102912 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Greber, J. (2024). 'Is anyone going to pay' for a green premium? Australian Financial Review, 7 February (retrieved 10/02/24)
  12. Howard-White, F. B. (1963). Nickel: An historical review. Van Nostrand Co.
  13. Klinger, J. M. (2018) Rare Earth Frontiers: From terrestrial subsoils to lunar landscapes. Cornell University Press.
  14. Kröger, M., & Nygren, A. (2020). Shifting frontier dynamics in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change 20 (3): 364-386. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12354 · DOI
  15. Marx, K. [1867] (1990). Capital: Volume I. Penguin Books.
  16. Marx, K. [1885] (1992). Capital: Volume II. Penguin Books.
  17. Mitchell, D. (2021). The Whole Shebang: Commentary 2. Progress in Human Geography, 45 (4), 914-922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520978868 · DOI
  18. Moore, J. W. (2010a). 'Amsterdam is standing on Norway' Part I: The alchemy of capital, empire and nature in the diaspora of silver, 1545-1648. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10 (1), 33-68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471- 0366.2009.00256.x · DOI
  19. Moore, J. W. (2010b). 'Amsterdam is standing on Norway' Part II: The Global North Atlantic in the ecological revolution of the Long Seventeenth Century. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(2), 188-227, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2009.00262.x · DOI
  20. Moore, J. W. (2011). Transcending the metabolic rift: A theory of crises in the capitalist world-ecology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38 (1), 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2010.538579 · DOI
  21. Rasmussen, M. B., & Lund, C. (2018). Reconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource con- trol. World Development 101: 388-399, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Riofrancos, T. (2023). The Security-Sustainability Nexus: Lithium onshoring in the global North. Global Envi- ronmental Politics, 23(1): 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00668 · DOI
  23. S&P Global. (2022). World exploration trends 2022. PDAC Special Edition, https://www.spglobal.com/market- intelligence/en/news-insights/blog/world-exploration-trends-2022
  24. S&P Global. (2024b). Trade review: Asian nickel to see mixed Q1 on ample supply, expected demand recovery, S&P Global Commodity Insights https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest- news/metals/012524-trade-review-asian-nickel-to-see-mixed-q1-on-ample-supply-expected-demand-re- covery (Accessed 11.02/2024)
  25. Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism: Competition, conflict, crisis. Oxford University Press.
  26. Tornel, C. (2023). Energy justice in the context of green extractivism: Perpetuating ontological and epistemolog- ical violence in the Yucatan Peninsula. Journal of Political Ecology, 30(1) https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.5485 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Tsing, A. L. (2003). Natural resources and capitalist frontiers. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (48), 5100-5106.
  28. Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.
  29. Verweijen, J. & Dunlap, A. (2021). The evolving techniques of the social engineering of extraction: Introducing political (re)actions 'from above' in large-scale mining and energy projects. Political Geography 88, 102342, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102342 · DOI
  30. Verweijen, J., Himley, M. & Frederiksen, M. (2023). Unearthing extractive subjects: Power and subjectivity at the extractive frontier. Geoforum 148, 103917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103917 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbesgaard, M., & Whitmore, A.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • London Mining Network
Corresponding author
Barbesgaard, Mads
Venue
Journal of Political Ecology
Published
2024-05-22
Volume
30
Issue
1
ISSN
1073-0451 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399029376
Cited by
5
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Political Ecology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
Keywords
nickel, commodity frontiers, green extractivism, brake power, mining companies, energy transition minerals, accumulation strategies, political ecology, decarbonization, battery minerals, state-mining relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review