Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Transmission of Ehrlichia canis to Dogs by Ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus)

Groves, Michael G., Dennis, George L., Amyx, Herbert L., Huxsoll, David L.·1975·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

SUMMARY: Two strains of Rhipicephalus sanguineus acquired Ehrlichia canis by feeding as either larvae or nymphs on acutely infected dogs and, in subsequent instars, transmitted the agent to normal dogs. Three strains of R sanguineus transmitted E canis as adults after their larval and nymphal stages fed on infected dogs. More than 400 adult female ticks were fed on infected dogs as larvae or nymphs or both, but none transmitted E canis transovarially.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1975.36.07.937

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Groves, M. G., Dennis, G. L., Amyx, H. L., & Huxsoll, D. L.
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1975-07-01
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
937-940
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2431030215
Cited by
310
References
0
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transmission of Ehrlichia canis to Dogs by Ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2460/ajvr.1975.36.07.937
The paper
Groves, M. G., Dennis, G. L., Amyx, H. L., & Huxsoll, D. L. (1975). Transmission of Ehrlichia canis to Dogs by Ticks (Rhipicephalus sanguineus). American Journal of Veterinary Research. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.1975.36.07.937

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.