Cited by 16

Evaluation of Granulated Fenbendazole (22.2%) Against Induced and Naturally Occurring Helminth Infections in Cats

Roberson, Edward L., Burke, T. Michael·1980·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

SUMMARY: A granulated formulation of 22.2% fenbendazole was tested for anthelmintic activity against helminths in cats. The drug was administered in 20 g of canned food on each of 3 days at a dosage of 50 mg/kg of body weight/day. Of 31 young adult cats harboring naturally occurring infections of Toxocara cati, 16 were treated and 15 served as controls. There was 100% clearance of ascarids from all treated cats. Among controls, 18% of the ascarid burden was expelled naturally. Thirty additional cats were acclimated for 2 months prior to infecting them experimentally with Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Taenia taeniaeformis, and Ancylostoma tubaeforme. Treatment caused a transitory reduction in the number of lungworm larvae. Histopathologically, cells of developing eggs and of a majority of 1st-stage larvae in lungs of treated cats had evidence of marked degeneration and necrosis, whereas the same stage of larvae in lungs of control cats were normal. Although the number of lung lesions in treated cats was approximately half the number found in controls, there was no significant (P > 0.05) indication that this was due to treatment. Fenbendazole was effective against induced infections of A tubaeforme and Taen taeniaeformis. Greater than 99.9% of hookworms were expelled from 16 treated cats as compared with a 2% natural expulsion from 15 controls. Of 24 cats that developed patent infections of Taen taeniaeformis, 12 were treated and cleared of this parasite, whereas 9 of 12 controls continued to harbor 1 to 10 tapeworms at the time of necropsy. Fenbendazole at a dosage of 50 mg/kg/day × 3 days appeared to be an effective anthelmintic against the common ascarid, hookworm, and tapeworm of cats. Its activity against lungworms was inconclusive at the dosage used, but the data suggest the need for investigating its activity against this parasite at higher dosages, for longer periods of treatment, or both.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1980.41.09.1499

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In this study, fenbendazole was administered to 14 cats at dosages exceeding the dosage found in a previous study to be effective in cats with common gastrointestinal parasites and to 7 cats at the reported dose for 3 times the reported duration; these dosages did not cause any clinical, subclinical, gross, or histologic changes.

    “In this study, fenbendazole was administered to 14 cats at dosages exceeding the dosage found in a previous study 5 to be effective in cats with common gastrointestinal parasites and to 7 cats at the reported dose 5 for 3 times the reported duration.These dosages did not cause any clinical, subclinical (as determined by serum biochemical analyses and CBC), gross, or histologic changes.”

    From Evaluation of the safety of fenbendazole in cats (2000) · cites this paper as [5]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberson, E. L., & Burke, T. M.
Affiliations
From the Department of Parasitology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602.
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1980-09-01
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1499-1502
ISSN
0002-9645
Cited by
16
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review