Cited by 53Helminth infection and controlVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaMollusks and Parasites Studies

Efficacy and Safety of Emodepside 2.1 %/Praziquantel 8.6% Spot-on Formulation in the Treatment of Feline Aelurostrongylosis

Traversa, Donato, Milillo, Piermarino, Di Cesare, Angela, Lohr, Beate, Iorio, Raffaella, Pampurini, Fabrizio, Schaper, Roland, Bartolini, Roberto +1 more·2009·Parasitology Research

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the antiparasitic spot-on formulation containing emodepside 2.1%/praziquantel 8.6% (Profender, Bayer) in the treatment of natural feline infection with the lungworm Aelurostrongylus abstrusus (Nematoda, Strongylida). Efficacy of Profender given once at the licensed dose was tested in comparison to a control oral formulation containing fenbendazole 18.75% (Panacur, Intervet) given over three consecutive days at the licensed dose. Efficacy assessment was based on larvae per gramme of faeces (LPG) counts, measured on days 28 +/- 2 following treatment and compared to counts on days -6 to -2. In total 24 cats treated either with Profender (n = 12) or with Panacur (n = 12) were included in the assessment of efficacy and safety. Mean LPG post-baseline counts (days 28 +/- 2) were 1.3 LPG for both Profender and Panacur, demonstrating similar efficacy of 99.38% for Profender and 99.29% for the control product. No treated animals showed adverse events. This trial demonstrated that both Profender spot-on formulation and oral paste Panacur are safe and effective in the treatment of aelurotrongylosis in cats. Future practical perspectives in feline medicine and the major advantages of the spot-on product compared to the oral paste are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00436-009-1499-5

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indocile or feral cats refusing oral formulations can be easily treated with the spot-on containing moxidectin or emodepside.

    “indocile or feral cats refusing oral formulations can be easily treated with the spot-on containing moxidectin or emodepside [171,172]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Traversa, D., Milillo, P., Di Cesare, A., Lohr, B., Iorio, R., Pampurini, F., Schaper, R., Bartolini, R., & Heine, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Teramo (IT)
  • Bayer (Italy) (IT)
  • Elanco Animal Health (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Traversa, Donato
Venue
Parasitology Research
Published
2009-06-28
Volume
105
Issue
S1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
  • 0044-3255 (ISSN-L)
  • 0932-0113
  • 1432-1955
OpenAlex
W2073515950
Cited by
53
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Parasitology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UniTERAMO Research Catalog (University of Teramo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bayer Animal Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Mollusks and Parasites Studies
Keywords
emodepside, praziquantel, spot-on formulation, Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, fenbendazole, antiparasitic drug efficacy, drug safety, fecal egg count
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthelmintics, Cat Diseases, Cats, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Feces, Fenbendazole, Larva, Metastrongyloidea, Praziquantel, Treatment Outcome, Strongylida Infections, Depsipeptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review