Cited by 18Helminth infection and controlParasites and Host InteractionsParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Efficacy of milbemycin oxime against naturally acquired or experimentally induced Ancylostoma spp and Trichuris vulpis infections in dogs

Open access
Blagburn, Byron L., Hendrix, Charles M., Lindsay, David S., Vaughan, Joy L., Hepler, Douglas I., Wright, James C.·1992·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

Summary: The efficacy of milbemycin oxime was evaluated at dosages of 0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg/kg of body weight in dogs naturally infected with mature Ancylostoma spp, at a dosage of 0.50 mg/kg in dogs with experimentally induced immature and mature A caninum, and at dosages of 0.55 to 0.86 mg/kg in dogs naturally infected with mature Trichuris vulpis. Milbemycin oxime was 95 and 99% effective against mature Ancylostoma spp at dosages of 0.50 and 0.75 mg/kg, respectively, but only 49% effective at a dosage of 0.25 mg/kg. Efficacy was 49% against pulmonary L 3-L 4 stages of A caninum (36 hours after inoculation), > 80% against L 4 (120 hours after inoculation) and early L 5 stages (216 hours after inoculation), and > 90% against experimentally induced mature stages (360 hours after inoculation). Milbemycin oxime was also 97% effective in the removal of mature Tr vulpis from naturally infected dogs. Adverse reactions were not observed following treatment in any of the dogs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.1991.53.04.513

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Blagburn, B. L., Hendrix, C. M., Lindsay, D. S., Vaughan, J. L., Hepler, D. I., & Wright, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • From the Department of Pathobiology (Blagburn, Hendrix, Lindsay, Vaughan, Wright), College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, AL 36849-5519; and the Animal Health Division, CIBA-GEIGY Corp, Greensboro, NC 27419 (Hepler).
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
1992-04-01
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
513-516
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391198686
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
milbemycin oxime, Ancylostoma caninum, Ancylostoma, Trichuris vulpis, canine hookworm infection, anthelmintic efficacy, dose comparison, adverse drug reactions, dogs
MeSH terms
Ancylostomiasis, Animals, Anthelmintics, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Feces, Female, Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic, Male, Parasite Egg Count, Trichuriasis, Macrolides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review