Cited by 12Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesSmart Agriculture and AIAnimal health and immunology

Discrimination of Healthy versus Sick Steers by Means of Continuous Remote Monitoring of Animal Activity

Open access
Smith, Jacqueline L., Vanzant, Eric S., Carter, Craig N., Jackson, Carney B.·2015·American Journal of Veterinary Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To test a unique electronic ear tag designed to collect movement data to determine whether physical activity of sick steers differed from that of healthy steers. ANIMALS 206 steers. PROCEDURES Physical activity in 2 groups of steers during November and December of 2010 (101 steers; the tag of 1 steer failed, and thus that steer was removed from the study, which resulted in data for 100 steers) and 2011 (105 steers) was monitored with an electronic ear tag device with an on-board triple-axis accelerometer. The accelerometer recorded motion in all 3 axes in the form of counts per minute. A radio-frequency transmitter on the ear tag delivered serial packets of motion data to a local server. An algorithm was developed to analyze the activity data to determine whether this technique could be used to assess health status with high accuracy. RESULTS Steers that became sick had significantly fewer activity counts (approx 25% fewer), compared with the activity counts of steers that remained healthy the entire time. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE In this study, automated detection of health status in growing cattle was feasible through remote monitoring of animal activity. Early identification of sick animals should lead to improved health outcomes, increased marketability, and improved animal well-being and help to minimize the use of antimicrobials that could contribute to resistant bacteria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2460/ajvr.76.8.739

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]8. Dantzer R, Bluthe RM, Gheusi G, et al. Molecular basis of sick- ness behavior. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998;856:132-138.
  2. [19]19. Smith DLT. Sodium salt poisoning. In: Dunne HW, Leman AD, eds. In: Diseases of swine. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State Press, 1975;854-860.
  3. [31]31. Fan J, Gijbels I. Local polynomial modeling and its applica- tions: monographs on statistics and applied probability 66. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press,1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, J. L., Vanzant, E. S., Carter, C. N., & Jackson, C. B.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Jacqueline L.
Venue
American Journal of Veterinary Research
Published
2015-08
Volume
76
Issue
8
Pages
739-744
ISSN
0002-9645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172919904
Cited by
12
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Veterinary Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
steers, cattle health monitoring, electronic ear tags, accelerometer, animal activity, remote monitoring, early disease detection, health assessment, antimicrobial use reduction, animal welfare
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Movement, Remote Sensing Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review