The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ADC Mapping of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions and evaluating the detection accuracy of the cancer extension. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used DWI to obtain images of 191 benign and malignant lesions (24 benign, 167 malignant) before surgical excision. The ADC values of the benign and malignant lesions were compared, as were the values of noninvasive ductal carcinoma (NIDC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We also evaluated the ADC map, which represents the distribution of ADC values, and compared it with the cancer extension. RESULTS: The mean ADC value of each type of lesion was as follows: malignant lesions, 1.22+/-0.31 x 10(-3) mm2/s; benign lesions, 1.67+/-0.54 x 10(-3) mm2/s; normal tissues, 2.09+/-0.27 x 10(-3) mm2/s. The mean ADC value of the malignant lesions was statistically lower than that of the benign lesions and normal breast tissues. The ADC value of IDC was statistically lower than that of NIDC. The sensitivity of the ADC value for malignant lesions with a threshold of less than 1.6 x 10(-3) mm2/s was 95% and the specificity was 46%. A full 75% of all malignant cases exhibited a near precise distribution of low ADC values on ADC maps to describe malignant lesions. The main causes of false negative and underestimation of cancer spread were susceptibility artifact because of bleeding and tumor structure. Major histologic types of false-positive lesions were intraductal papilloma and fibrocystic diseases. Fibrocystic diseases also resulted in overestimation of cancer extension. CONCLUSIONS: DWI has the potential in clinical appreciation to detect malignant breast tumors and support the evaluation of tumor extension. However, the benign proliferative change remains to be studied as it mimics the malignant phenomenon on the ADC map.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging
Bammer, R. (2003) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(02)00303-0 · Cited by 851
Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion‐weighted imaging
Guo, Y., Cai, Y., Cai, Z., Gao, Y., An, N., Ma, L., Mahankali, S., & Gao, J. (2002) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.10140 · Cited by 714
Breast Carcinoma: Effect of Preoperative Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the Therapeutic Approach
Fischer, U., Kopka, L., & Grabbe, E. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.213.3.r99dc01881 · Cited by 664
Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis
Filippi, M., Cercignani, M., Inglese, M., Horsfield, M. A., & Comi, G. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.3.304 · Cited by 546
Buadu, L. D., Murakami, J., Murayama, S., Hashiguchi, N., Sakai, S., Masuda, K., Toyoshima, S., Kuroki, S., & Ohno, S. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.200.3.8756909 · Cited by 465
Lyng, H., Haraldseth, O., & Rofstad, E. K. (2000) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/1522-2594(200006)43:6<828::aid-mrm8>3.0.co;2-p · Cited by 431
Boetes, C., Barentsz, J. O., Mus, R. D. M., van der Sluis, R. F., van Erning, L. J. T. O., Hendriks, J. H. C. L., Holland, R., & Ruys, S. H. (1994) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972823 · Cited by 377
Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging.
Namimoto, T., Yamashita, Y., Sumi, S., Tang, Y., & Takahashi, M. (1997) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.204.3.9280252 · Cited by 349
Tsuruda, J. S., Chew, W. M., Moseley, M. E., & Norman, D. (1990) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.155.5.2120936 · Cited by 330
Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging.
Mumtaz, H., Hall-Craggs, M. A., Davidson, T., Walmsley, K., Thurell, W., Kissin, M. W., & Taylor, I. (1997) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.169.2.9242745 · Cited by 291
Cited by
On behalf of the EUSOBI international Breast Diffusion-Weighted Imaging working group, Baltzer, P., Mann, R. M., Iima, M., Sigmund, E. E., Clauser, P., Gilbert, F. J., Martincich, L., Partridge, S. C., Patterson, A., et al. (2020) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-019-06510-3 · Cited by 437
Sharma, U., Danishad, K. K. A., Seenu, V., & Jagannathan, N. R. (2009) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.1245 · Cited by 321
Fujii, S., Kakite, S., Nishihara, K., Kanasaki, Y., Harada, T., Kigawa, J., Kaminou, T., & Ogawa, T. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21575 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- WOODHAMS, R., MATSUNAGA, K., KAN, S., HATA, H., OZAKI, M., IWABUCHI, K., KURANAMI, M., WATANABE, M., & HAYAKAWA, K.
- Venue
- Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-42
- ISSN
- 1347-3182 (ISSN-L)
- 1880-2206
- OpenAlex
- W2088197232
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ADC Mapping of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2463/mrms.4.35
- The paper
- WOODHAMS, R., MATSUNAGA, K., KAN, S., HATA, H., OZAKI, M., IWABUCHI, K., KURANAMI, M., WATANABE, M., & HAYAKAWA, K. (2005). ADC Mapping of Benign and Malignant Breast Tumors. Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.4.35
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.