Cited by 51Psychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Reliability and validity of the outcome questionnaire‐ 45.2

Boswell, Donald L., White, Jason K., Sims, Wendy D., Harrist, R. Steven, Romans, John S. C.·2013·Psychological Reports

Abstract

A random sample of 220 counseling center client records at a large Midwestern university, was used to assess reliability and validity of the Outcome Questionnaire-45.2 (OQ-45.2). The center uses the OQ-45.2 at intake. Internal consistency coefficients for the three subscales and the total score were acceptable, with high coefficients for the total score and Symptom Distress subscale and moderate coefficients for the Interpersonal Relations and Social Role subscales. Correlations among clients' presenting concerns and OQ-45.2 scores were computed and lend strong support for the validity of the OQ-45.2 total score and the Symptom Distress subscale. Weaker support was found for the Interpersonal Relations and Social Role subscales.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/02.08.pr0.112.3.689-693

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boswell, D. L., White, J. K., Sims, W. D., Harrist, R. S., & Romans, J. S. C.
Affiliations
Oklahoma State University (US)
Corresponding author
Boswell, Donald L.
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2013-06
Volume
112
Issue
3
Pages
689-693
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W2144061278
Cited by
51
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychometric validation, reliability statistics, validity, counseling center clients, presenting concerns, symptom distress, interpersonal relationships, social roles, internal consistency, university counseling services
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Random Allocation, Reproducibility of Results, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review