Cited by 40Physical Activity and HealthBehavioral Health and InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Accelerometer feedback to promote physical activity in adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study

Paschali, Antonia A., Kalantzi-Azizi, Anastasia, Goodrick, G. Kenneth, Papadatou, Danai, Balasubramanyam, Ashok·2005·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

This study examined whether giving activity feedback to obese, sedentary adults with Type 2 diabetes would improve their adherence to a home-based walking program. 49 subjects were recruited. Ten failed a treadmill cardiovascular test. Another 9 dropped out before the intervention, and 4 dropped out during the intervention. The remaining 26 adults (14 women, 12 men; age M = 48.1 yr., SD = 7.1) received behavioral counseling monthly for 3 mo. regarding exercise. All subjects wore a triaxial accelerometer during these 3 months. Randomly, half of the subjects were blind to the data from the accelerometers, i.e., no feedback, and had counseling based on their self-report diaries. The other half had access to the accelerometer data, got a computerized graph of their physical activity for the period between counseling sessions, and had counseling based on these objective data, i.e., feedback. The feedback group showed an increase in exercise over the 3 mo. The nonfeedback group showed an increase in activity at 1.5 mo. but reverted to their baseline exercise levels at 3 mo. However, analysis of variance showed there was at least an 8% probability that this effect was due to chance, so the hypothesis that feedback would improve exercise adherence could not be supported. Further studies with larger sample sizes and greater control of experimental conditions are needed to determine the utility of objective activity feedback.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.100.1.61-68

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with traditional approaches that rely on recall or paper-based records, digital wearable devices provide continuous and objective tracking of step counts, activity duration, heart rate, and energy expenditure, thereby converting exercise behavior into visible and quantifiable information.

    “Compared with traditional approaches that rely on recall or paper-based records, digital wearable devices provide continuous and objective tracking of step counts, activity duration, heart rate, and energy expenditure, thereby converting exercise behavior into visible and quantifiable information (14, 16–18).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paschali, A. A., Kalantzi-Azizi, A., Goodrick, G. K., Papadatou, D., & Balasubramanyam, A.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Goodrick, G. Kenneth
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2005-02
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
61-68
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W2109832155
Cited by
40
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dk054710-02)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-R01-73696, R01HL073696)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-R01-54710)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
accelerometer feedback, physical activity, type 2 diabetes, exercise adherence, behavioral counseling, sedentary adults, obesity, objective activity monitoring, self-monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Feedback, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review