Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 266

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Work Values and Job Satisfaction

Elizur, Dov·1991·Psychological Reports

Abstract

In reviewing work values and job satisfaction questionnaires one may find similar items included in both. It is argued that the item range (important to unimportant, satisfied to dissatisfied) defines the research problem rather than the item domain, and so the same item domain may be included in both questionnaires.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.386

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 266

Metadata

Authors
Elizur, D.
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
1991-10
Volume
69
Issue
2
Pages
386-386
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W4249286441
Cited by
266
References
4
FWCI
14.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work Values and Job Satisfaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.386
The paper
Elizur, D. (1991). Work Values and Job Satisfaction. Psychological Reports. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.69.2.386

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.