Cited by 3Rural development and sustainabilitySustainable Urban and Rural DevelopmentUrban Development and Cultural Heritage

Participatory Design as a Tool for Sustainable Regional Development

Open access
Ontkóc, Marián, Kotradyová, Veronika·2021·Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU

Abstract

Abstract Globalization changes our world too quick and regions cannot keep up. Copying mechanisms affect crafted products and architecture and create specific signs for each region. Understanding that, we can follow cultural concepts and transform them to fit the current era and sustain local identity within communities. Compared with evolution, community attachment as part of social sustainability has the same self-regulated mechanisms. The adaptation process can be achieved in different ways, but only few are truly sustainable. To restore the sense of community and reconnect local people to their village at a deeper level, the participatory approach was tested. The process and tools well known from urban areas were applied in certain Slovak villages. As compared to participation in cities, in the rural environment, the process is more time-consuming. In theory, this should bring a result that lasts longer than that achieved by standard processes. Methods proposed by us will have several outcomes like networking, open communication and, if successful, can be an inspiration for other villages and activists to adopt the approach. This time-demanding activity can help to support local people and show them how to coordinate themselves in the decision-making process. The bottom-up approach increases self-esteem and by place-making, small public intervention can help with communication with local municipalities. In this process, the designer acts as a facilitator of a multidisciplinary innovation project and must use own creativity to handle many challenges.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/alfa-2021-0010

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is too much power in the role of the facilitator.

    “There is too much power in the role of the facilitator”

    From An introduction to radical participatory design: decolonising participatory design processes (2022) · cites this paper as Ontkóc & Kotradyová 2021

    The 'Designer as Facilitator' section says facilitators manage groups and set rules for creative interaction; 'Participative Methods' says they choose the methods used. These passages establish substantial responsibility and influence, but the paper does not say facilitators have too much power. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Jandourek, J. (2001) "Sociologický slovník". Portál Praha, Czech Republic, pp. 106.
  2. Gažová, V. (1997) "Aktuálnosť problematiky identity v sú- časnej kulturologickej reflexii", In: Otázky žurnalistiky. Volume 40, Issue 1, pp. 13-18.
  3. Jackson, J. W. (1993) "Realistic Group Conflict Theory: A Review and Evaluation of the Theoretical and Empirical Liter- ature", Psychological Record, Volume (43) issue 3, pp. 395- 415.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ontkóc, M., & Kotradyová, V.
Affiliations
Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava (SK)
Corresponding author
Ontkóc, Marián
Venue
Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU
Published
2021-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
24-30
ISSN
2729-7640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3175392440
Cited by
3
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Architecture Papers of the Faculty of Architecture and Design STU (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
participatory design, sustainable regional development, rural villages, local identity, community attachment, social sustainability, place-making, bottom-up decision-making, multidisciplinary innovation, rural communities, Slovakia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review