Cited by 192Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Oxytocin has dose-dependent developmental effects on pair-bonding and alloparental care in female prairie voles

Open access
Bales, Karen L., van Westerhuyzen, Julie A., Lewis-Reese, Antoniah D., Grotte, Nathaniel D., Lanter, Jalene A., Carter, C. Sue·2007·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

The present study examines the developmental consequences of neonatal exposure to oxytocin on adult social behaviors in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Female neonates were injected within 24 h of birth with isotonic saline or one of four dosages of oxytocin (OT). As adults, females were tested in an elevated plus-maze paradigm (a measure of anxiety and exploratory behavior), and for alloparental behavior and partner preferences. At 2 mg/kg OT, females took longer to approach pups, but were the only group to form a statistically significant within-group partner preference. At 4 mg/kg OT, females retrieved pups significantly more frequently but no longer displayed a partner preference; while females treated developmentally with 8 mg/kg spent significantly more time in side-to-side contact with a male stranger than any other treatment group. OT may have broad developmental consequences, but these effects are not linear and may both increase and decrease the propensity to display behaviors such as pair-bonding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.05.004

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bales, K. L., van Westerhuyzen, J. A., Lewis-Reese, A. D., Grotte, N. D., Lanter, J. A., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bales, Karen L.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
274-279
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017104298
Cited by
192
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Public Health Service (R01 073022)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH073022)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01 HD 38490, P01HD038490, F32 HD08702, F32HD008702)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
oxytocin, Microtus ochrogaster, pair bonding, mate preferences, alloparental care, pup retrieval, female social behavior, anxiety, exploratory behavior, dose-dependent effects, developmental programming
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Arvicolinae, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Nesting Behavior, Oxytocin, Pair Bond, Maze Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review