Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Study on the Data Management of Citizen Science: From the Data Life Cycle Perspective

Open access
Shwe, Khin Mar·2020·Data and Information Management

Abstract

There has been considerable growth in citizen science in academic contributions—researches by the paradigms of different disciplines and by the activities of citizens when undertaking data collecting, data processing, and data analyzing for disseminating results. These researches have proved the importance of data management practices—urgent to carry out the data life cycle. This study aims to analyze the scientific data contribution of citizen science under the data life cycle approach. It investigates 1,020 citizen science projects within the DataONE life cycle framework, which includes data management plan, data collection, data quality assurance, data documentation, data discovery, data integration, data preservation, and data analysis. As the major finding, the result of this study shows that the data management plan is developed with the leading of universities, which are the host of the majority of citizen science projects. The processes of data collection, data quality assurance, data documentation, data preservation, and data analysis are well organized with the systematic tool in the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) age; meanwhile the citizen science projects are cumulative. Data discovery has mostly linked with SciStarter (citizen science community site) and Facebook (social media). In data integration, it is found that most of the projects integrate

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/dim-2020-0019

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Shwe, K. M.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Shwe, Khin Mar
Venue
Data and Information Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
279-296
ISSN
2543-9251 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3097026000
Cited by
7
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Data and Information Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
citizen science, data management, data lifecycle, DataONE, data management plans, data quality assurance, data documentation, data preservation, data discovery, data integration, Facebook

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on the Data Management of Citizen Science: From the Data Life Cycle Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2478/dim-2020-0019
The paper
Shwe, K. M. (2020). Study on the Data Management of Citizen Science: From the Data Life Cycle Perspective. Data and Information Management. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.