Cited by 245Electric Vehicles and InfrastructureElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesVehicle emissions and performance

Comparison of the Overall Energy Efficiency for Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles and Electric Vehicles

Open access
Albatayneh, Aiman, Assaf, Mohammad N., Alterman, Dariusz, Jaradat, Mustafa·2020·Environmental and Climate Technologies

Abstract

Abstract The tremendous growth in the transportation sector as a result of changes in our ways of transport and a rise in the level of prosperity was reflected directly by the intensification of energy needs. Thus, electric vehicles (EV) have been produced to minimise the energy consumption of conventional vehicles. Although the EV motor is more efficient than the internal combustion engine, the well to wheel (WTW) efficiency should be investigated in terms of determining the overall energy efficiency. In simple words, this study will try to answer the basic question – is the electric car really energy efficient compared with ICE-powered vehicles? This study investigates the WTW efficiency of conventional internal combustion engine vehicles ICEVs (gasoline, diesel), compressed natural gas vehicles (CNGV) and EVs. The results show that power plant efficiency has a significant consequence on WTW efficiency. The total WTW efficiency of gasoline ICEV ranges between 11–27 %, diesel ICEV ranges from 25 % to 37 % and CNGV ranges from 12 % to 22 %. The EV fed by a natural gas power plant shows the highest WTW efficiency which ranges from 13 % to 31 %. While the EV supplied by coal-fired and diesel power plants have approximately the same WTW efficiency ranging between 13 % to 27 % and 12 % to 25 %, respectively. If renewable energy is used, the losses will drop significantly and the overall efficiency for electric cars will be around 40–70% depending on the source and the location of the renewable energy systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2478/rtuect-2020-0041

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Total well-to-wheel efficiency of gasoline vehicles ranges from 11% to 27%, whereas diesel vehicles range from 25% to 37%.

    “total WTW efficiency of gasoline vehicles ranges from 11% to 27%, whereas diesel vehicles range from 25% to 37% [3].”

    From A Review on Electric Vehicles: Technologies and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [3]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albatayneh, A., Assaf, M. N., Alterman, D., & Jaradat, M.
Affiliations
  • German Jordanian University (JO)
  • Energy Engineering Department, School of Natural Resources Engineering and Management , German Jordanian University , Amman , Jordan
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Albatayneh, Aiman
Venue
Environmental and Climate Technologies
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
669-680
ISSN
  • 1691-5208 (ISSN-L)
  • 2255-8837
OpenAlex
W3151080431
Cited by
245
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 12
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental and Climate Technologies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
Keywords
electric vehicles, internal combustion engine vehicles, compressed natural gas vehicles, power plant efficiency, energy consumption, renewable energy, gasoline vehicles, diesel vehicles, coal-fired power plants, diesel power plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review