Towards a vertical datum standardisation under the umbrella of Global Geodetic Observing System
Open accessAbstract
Most of the existing height systems refer to local sea surface levels, are stationary (do not consider variations in time), and realise different physical height types (orthometric, normal, normal-orthometric, etc.). In general, their accuracy is about two orders of magnitude less than that of the realisation of geometric reference systems (sub millimetre level). The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG), taking care of providing a precise geodetic infrastructure for monitoring the system Earth, promotes the standardisation of height systems worldwide. The main objectives are: (1) to provide a reliable frame for consistent analysis and modelling of global phenomena and processes affecting the Earth’s gravity field and the Earth’s surface geometry; and (2) to support the precise combination of physical and geometric heights in order to exploit at a maximum the advantages of satellite geodesy (e.g. combination of satellite positioning and gravity field models for worldwide unified precise height determination). According to this, the GGOS Theme 1 ”Unified Height System” was established in February 2010 with the purpose to bring together existing initiatives and to address the activities to be faced. Starting point are the results delivered by the IAG Inter-Commission Project 1.2 ”Vertical Reference Frames” during the period 2003-2011. The present actions related to the vertical datum homogenisation are being coordinated by the working group ”Vertical Datum Standardisation”, which directly depends on the GGOS Theme 1 and is supported by the IAG Commissions 1 (Reference Frames) and 2 (Gravity Field), as well as by the International Gravity Field Service (IGFS). This paper discusses some aspects to take into consideration for the realisation of a standardised globally unified vertical reference system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are several methods to realize the geoid as closest to the mean sea level so that there is yet no adopted standard to define a reference geoid and W_geoid value.
“In addition, there are several methods to realize the geoid as 'closest to the mean sea level' so that there is yet no adopted standard to define a reference geoid and W geoid value (see e.g. a discussion in [125]).”
From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [125]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Drewes, H., Kuglitsch, F., Adám, J., & Rózsa, S. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0948-z · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Definition and Proposed Realization of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Ihde, J., Sánchez, L., Barzaghi, R., Drewes, H., Foerste, C., Gruber, T., Liebsch, G., Marti, U., Pail, R., & Sideris, M. (2017) · Surveys in Geophysics · doi:10.1007/s10712-017-9409-3 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationA conventional value for the geoid reference potential $$W_{0}$$ W 0
Sánchez, L., Čunderlík, R., Dayoub, N., Mikula, K., Minarechová, Z., Šíma, Z., Vatrt, V., & Vojtíšková, M. (2016) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-016-0913-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Self-citationStrategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS)
Sánchez, L., Ågren, J., Huang, J., Wang, Y. M., Mäkinen, J., Pail, R., Barzaghi, R., Vergos, G. S., Ahlgren, K., & Liu, Q. (2021) · Journal of Geodesy · doi:10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Self-citationClock networks for height system unification: a simulation study
Wu, H., Müller, J., & Lämmerzahl, C. (2019) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1093/gji/ggy508 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications
Delva, P., Denker, H., & Lion, G. (2019) · Fundamental Theories of Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11500-5_2 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“there are several methods to realize the geoid as \closest to the mean sea level" so that there is yet no adopted standard to dene a reference geoid and W geoid value (see e.g. a discussion in [125]). Several authors have considered the time variation of W geoid , see e.g. [126, 127], but there is some uncertaint…”
MethodXiong, C., Liu, D., Wu, L., Bao, L., & Zhang, P. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14174141 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sánchez, L.
- Affiliations
- 1Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut (DGFI), Munich, Germany
- Venue
- Journal of Geodetic Science
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2012-12-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 325-342
- ISSN
- 2081-9919 (ISSN-L)
- 2081-9943
- OpenAlex
- W1982390331
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Geodetic Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geodetic Measurements and Engineering Structures
- Keywords
- vertical reference frame, Global Geodetic Observing System, orthometric height, normal height, satellite geodesy, gravity field models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review