Cited by 25Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationInfection Control and VentilationOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Performance of Respirator Filters Using Quality Factor in Korea.

Open access
HAN, Don-Hee·2000·INDUSTRIAL HEALTH

Abstract

A respirator filter of good quality has not only high aerosol collection efficiency but also low air resistance. "Quality factor", which is expressed with aerosol penetration and pressure drop, can be used to rank the performance of respirator filters within the same category. This study focuses on evaluating several respirator filters which are widely used in Korea using quality factor. Two mechanical filters and three filtering facepieces made by different manufacturers were measured aerosol penetrations and pressure drops by an automatic filter tester (CertiTest Model 8110, TSI Inc., St. Paul, USA) at four flow rates of 10, 32, 64 and 85 L/min. NaCl aerosols used were reported to be mean size of 0.1 microm and geometric standard deviation of <1.9. The penetrations and pressure drops of all filters have strong flow rate dependency. The filter quality factors decrease sharply as flow rates are increased. The mechanical filter S and filtering facepiece M are shown better filter quality than others in the same category. Since some certified filters are found to be inappropriate in the workplace exposed to fume, this result suggests that the current certified filter test protocol for respirators should be changed for the new protocol using smaller aerosols.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2486/indhealth.38.380

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]10. Hinds WC (1982) Aerosol technology. 164-86, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  2. [11]11. American Industrial Hygiene Association (1997) The occupational environments-its evaluation and control. ed. by DiNardi SR, 244-5, AIHA press, Fairfax, Virginia.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAN, D.-H.
Affiliations
Inje University (KR)
Corresponding author
HAN, Don-Hee
Venue
INDUSTRIAL HEALTH
Published
2000
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
380-384
ISSN
  • 0019-8366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-8026
OpenAlex
W1978319983
Cited by
25
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
respirator filters, quality factor, aerosol penetration, pressure drop, mechanical filters, flow rate dependence, NaCl aerosol, Korea
MeSH terms
Aerosols, Filtration, Humans, Pressure, Quality Control, Respiratory Protective Devices, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review