Cited by 165Infection Control and VentilationAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Filter Performance of N99 and N95 Facepiece Respirators Against Viruses and Ultrafine Particles

Open access
Eninger, Robert M., Honda, Takeshi, Adhikari, Atin, Heinonen-Tanski, Helvi, Reponen, Tiina, Grinshpun, Sergey A.·2008·The Annals of Occupational Hygiene

Abstract

The performance of three filtering facepiece respirators (two models of N99 and one N95) challenged with an inert aerosol (NaCl) and three virus aerosols (enterobacteriophages MS2 and T4 and Bacillus subtilis phage)—all with significant ultrafine components—was examined using a manikin-based protocol with respirators sealed on manikins. Three inhalation flow rates, 30, 85, and 150 l min−1, were tested. The filter penetration and the quality factor were determined. Between-respirator and within-respirator comparisons of penetration values were performed. At the most penetrating particle size (MPPS), >3% of MS2 virions penetrated through filters of both N99 models at an inhalation flow rate of 85 l min−1. Inhalation airflow had a significant effect upon particle penetration through the tested respirator filters. The filter quality factor was found suitable for making relative performance comparisons. The MPPS for challenge aerosols was <0.1 μm in electrical mobility diameter for all tested respirators. Mean particle penetration (by count) was significantly increased when the size fraction of <0.1 μm was included as compared to particles >0.1 μm. The filtration performance of the N95 respirator approached that of the two models of N99 over the range of particle sizes tested (∼0.02 to 0.5 μm). Filter penetration of the tested biological aerosols did not exceed that of inert NaCl aerosol. The results suggest that inert NaCl aerosols may generally be appropriate for modeling filter penetration of similarly sized virions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/annhyg/men019

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown agreement between physical penetrations of inert and biological aerosols at particle sizes of 1 μm and above.

    “Moreover, previous studies have shown agreement between physical penetrations of inert and biological aerosols at particle sizes of 1 µm and above.(13,16,24,31,32)”

    From Performance of Conventional and Antimicrobial-Treated Filtering Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Biological Aerosols (2012) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Conclusions and Future Work section says inert aerosols may generally model penetration of similarly sized viruses. But the Results and Discussion compare inert and biological aerosols at approximately 0.02–0.1 µm, not at 1 µm and above. The cited paper therefore supports the general comparison, but not the claimed particle-size range. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lee KW Mukund R Baron PA Willeke K Filter collection Aerosol measurement. principles, techniques and applications 2001 New York Wiley-Interscience 197 229
  2. Madigan MT Martinko JM Brock biology of microorganisms Viral diversity 2006 11th ed Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson Prentice Hall 503 30
  3. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Current Intelligence Bulletin: evaluation of health hazard and recommendations for occupational exposure to titanium dioxide Draft 2005 100 2 3
  4. Reponen T Willeke K Grinshpun SA et al Baron PA Willeke K Biological particle sampling Aerosol measurement. principles, techniques and applications 2001 New York Wiley-Interscience 751 77

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eninger, R. M., Honda, T., Adhikari, A., Heinonen-Tanski, H., Reponen, T., & Grinshpun, S. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Department of Environmental Science, University of Kuopio, Finland
Corresponding author
Grinshpun, Sergey A.
Venue
The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Published
2008-05-13
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
385-396
ISSN
  • 0003-4878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3162
OpenAlex
W2161354557
Cited by
165
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Annals of Occupational Hygiene (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Työsuojelurahasto
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (T42-OH008432, T42/OH008432-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
filtering facepiece respirators, N95 respirators, filter penetration, ultrafine particles, bacteriophage lambda, NaCl aerosol, inhalation flow rate, most penetrating particle size, filter quality factor, respiratory protection
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Occupational, Humans, Materials Testing, Particle Size, Respiratory Protective Devices, Ultrafiltration, Viruses, Occupational Exposure, Inhalation Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review