Cited by 20Digital Mental Health InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-beingMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Process evaluation of a web-based stress management program to promote psychological well-being in a sample of white-collar workers in Japan

Open access
KAWAI, Kaoru, YAMAZAKI, Yoshihiko, NAKAYAMA, Kazuhiro·2010·Industrial Health

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to conduct process evaluation of a web-based stress management program, which was designed to improve psychological well-being as a positive psychological function of humans. A total of 168 employees participated in the intervention. The pre-test was conducted at the time of registration and the post-test upon the completion of the program. Participants are requested to evaluate program sessions by answering four questions (informative, enjoyment, intention to act, self-efficacy belief). Participant evaluations of the sessions were also used as the mediating variable that influences program outcomes. For analysis, we built a model based on the program impact theory and conducted path analysis. Result revealed the majority of participants evaluated the program affirmatively in all sessions and the participant evaluations about the sessions directly predicted changes in psychological well-being (beta=0.29, p<0.01), and changes in the psychological well-being predicted changes in the scores of CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Rating Scale), which represent the level of depression (beta=0.50, p<0.001). In conclusion, the program can be effective if the participants feel enjoyment, and increase their intention and self-efficacy belief to cope with stress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2486/indhealth.48.265

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Murphy LR (1996) Stress management technique: sec- ondary prevention of stress. In: Handbook of work and health psychology, 427-44, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  2. Keller JM, Suzuki K (1988) Use of the ARCS motiva- tion model in courseware design. In: Instructional- design for microcomputer courseware, Jonassen D (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KAWAI, K., YAMAZAKI, Y., & NAKAYAMA, K.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Industrial Health
Published
2010
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
265-274
ISSN
  • 0019-8366 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-8026
OpenAlex
W2120644740
Cited by
20
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • SLIU Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
psychological well-being, white-collar workers, process evaluation, enjoyment, intention to act, self-efficacy, depression, occupational stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Depression, Employment, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Japan, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Program Evaluation, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review