Cited by 3Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and Optimizationtransportation and logistics systems

Automation and urban transport planning: Policy recommendations and best practices

Open access
DIANIN, ALBERTO, CAVALLARO, FEDERICO·2019·WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment

Abstract

Although Automation is expected to play a crucial role in the future development of transport, currently it lacks strong relations with urban mobility planning.Most types of plans such as SUMPs do not include operative references to Automation, overlooking strategic guidelines or useful measures to integrate this theme into the future vision of mobility.Such a lack represents a missed opportunity, since Automation could stimulate a more collective-oriented mobility paradigm and reduce most of the negative externalities generated by transport.The aim of this contribution is to highlight the importance for transport planning to start dealing with this process in a more rigorous way.For this purpose, the potential effects that Automation may have on transport and land use are summarized in three main types of scenarios.Then, a series of goals are identified, policy recommendations are provided, and exemplificative best practices as well as virtuous urban mobility plans are described.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2495/sc190541

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Leriche, Y., Mobility -Shared Autonomous Transport Services, Transdev, vol. 6, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DIANIN, A., & CAVALLARO, F.
Affiliations
Eurac Research (IT)
Venue
WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
WIT Press
Published
2019-12-10
Volume
1
Pages
627-638
ISSN
  • 1743-3541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-448X
OpenAlex
W2990146317
Cited by
3
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • WIT transactions on ecology and the environment (publishedVersion)
  • AirIuav (Università Iuav di Venezia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › transportation and logistics systems
Keywords
transport automation, urban mobility planning, Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans, land use, collective mobility, transport externalities, policy recommendations, best practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review