Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 26Urological Disorders and TreatmentsGenital Health and DiseaseSexual function and dysfunction studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Penile size in term newborn infants.

Open access
Akın, Yasemin, Ercan, Oya, Telatar, Berrin, Tarhan, Fatih·2011·The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

The objective of this study was to establish standard penile size in healthy full-term Turkish newborns and to evaluate the relation between penile and other anthropometric measures. For this prospective study, stretched penile length (SPL) and penile diameter (PD) of live-borns delivered in our hospital between September 2007-December 2008 were measured, and their birthweight, length and head circumference were recorded. Penile versus other anthropometric correlations were determined by Pearson analyses, followed by linear regression. In 1217 full-term subjects, mean SPL was 3.16 +/- 0.39 cm (+/- 2.5 SD = 2.19-4.14 cm), and mean PD was 1.21 +/- 0.11 cm (+/- 2.5 SD = 0.93-1.49 cm). Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation of SPL (p = 0.0001) to height, and PD to height (p = 0.0001) and birthweight (p = 0.002). Formulas were calculated for predicted individual values for PL and PD of newborns. In conclusion, there is a correlation between neonatal anthropometric measurements and penile anthropometry. Mean anthropometric differences of various ethnicities may account for the differences in mean SPL and PD among various ethnic populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2011.1772

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Fok TF, Hon KL, So HK, et al. Normative data of penile length for term Chinese newborns. Biol Neonate 2005; 87: 242-245.
  2. Cheng PS, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity? Horm Res 2001; 55: 278-281.
  3. Elder JS. Anomalies of the penis and urethra. In: Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds). Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics (18 th ed). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007: 2256-2257.
  4. Ting TH, Wu LL. Penile length of term newborn infants in multiracial Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2011; 50: 817-821.
  5. Boas M, Biosen KA, Virtanen HE, et al. Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 154: 125-129.
  6. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho Ly. Penile length of newborns in Singapore. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000; 13: 55-62.
  7. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Laron Z. Letter: penile size in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1975; 87: 663-664.
  8. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Damiao R, Silva EA. Penile anthropometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2007; 83: 441-446.
  9. Preiksa RT, Zilaitiene B, Matulevicius V. Penile size and testicular volume in healthy Lithuanian newborns. Endocr Abstr 2011; 20: P637.
  10. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J Urol 1994; 152: 4-14.
  11. Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle LW. Establishment of a normal range of penile length in preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34: 471-473.
  12. Levy JB, Husmann DA. Micropenis secondary to growth hormone deficiency: does treatment with growth hormone alone result in adequate penile growth. J Urol 1996; 156: 214-216.
  13. Wang CH, Lin WD, Bau DT, Tsai CH, Liu DC, Tsai FJ. Penile length of normal boys in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2006; 47: 293-296.
  14. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 314-316.
  15. Akarsu S, Öcal C, Kurt A, Yılmaz E, Kurt AN, Aygün AD. Sağlıklı çocuklarda penis uzunluğu ve testis çapı. Çocuk Dergisi 2005; 5: 259-263.
  16. Schonfeld WA, Beebe GW. Normal growth and variation in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J Urol 1942; 48: 759-777.
  17. Stoll BJ, Adams-Chapman I. The high-risk infant. In: Kliegman RM, Behrman RE, Jenson HB, Stanton BF (eds). Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics (18 th ed). Philadelphia: Saunders; 2007: 698-710.
  18. Troshev K. Contribution to the anthropometric study of the penis in a group of Bulgarian boys from birth to the age of seven years. Acta Chirurgiae Plast (Praha) 1969;11: 140-148.
  19. Promodu K, Shanmughadas KV, Bhat S, Nair KR. Penile length and circumference: an Indian study. Int J Impot Res 2007; 19: 558-563.
  20. Özbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring penile length in newborns and infants. BJU Int 1999; 84: 1093-1094.
  21. Kulkarni ML, Rajendran NK. Normal values for penile standards in newborns. Indian Pediatr 1991; 28: 1341- 1343.
  22. Vasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S. Genital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J Pediatr 1995; 62: 593-596.
  23. Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penile dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones 1989; 29: 146- 150.
  24. Ponchietti R, Mondaini N, Bonafe M, Loro FD, Biscioni S, Masieri L. Penile length and circumference: a study on 3300 young Italian males. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 183- 186. Volume 53 • Number 3 Penile Size in Term Newborns

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Akın, Y., Ercan, O., Telatar, B., & Tarhan, F.
Affiliations
  • Dr Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
  • Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR)
Venue
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2011-06-25
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
301-307
ISSN
  • 0041-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 2791-6421
OpenAlex
W7210281273
Cited by
26
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Keywords
penile size, stretched penile length, neonates, term infants, anthropometry, birth weight, head circumference
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Penis, Pregnancy, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.