Cited by 14Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesSexual Differentiation and DisordersUrological Disorders and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

One-year follow-up of penis and testis sizes of healthy Turkish male newborns

Open access
Semiz, Serap, Küçüktaşçı, Kazım, Zencir, Mehmet, Sevinç, Özgür·2011·The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Penile length, penile diameter and testicular volume at birth reflect the activity and normality of the hypothalamus-pituitary-testicular axis. In this prospective longitudinal study, we aimed to measure penis and testicular size in healthy newborns at birth and 6 and 12 months of age. Seven hundred forty-six term healthy male newborns were enrolled in the study. According to measurements taken within 48 hours after birth, mean penile length (MPL) was 2.81 +/- 0.32 cm, mean penile diameter (MPD) 1.04 +/- 0.09 cm, right testicular volume (TV) 1.73 +/- 0.45 ml, and left TV 1.64 +/- 0.48 ml. At 6 months of age, MPL was 3.67 +/- 0.35 cm, MPD 1.23 +/- 0.08 cm, right TV 2.07 +/- 0.31 ml, and left TV 2.00 +/- 0.27 ml. At 12 months of age, MPL was 4.47 +/- 0.43 cm, MPD 1.25 +/- 0.09 cm, right TV 2.01 +/- 0.12 ml, and left TV 2.01 +/- 0.13 ml. There was a weak albeit statistically significant correlation between weight, length and PL at birth. In conclusion, the MPL of newborns was shorter than that reported in the published data from other populations. This situation may be related to ethnicity in addition to the lower birth weight and length of our subjects when compared to the newborns in other populations. We observed a significant increase, more marked during the first six months, in MPL, MPD and TV, which can be explained by the hormonal mechanism during minipuberty.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24953/turkjpediatr.2011.1837

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a paucity of Indian data for penile and testicular parameters particularly in pubertal years.

    “Although some data are available in neonates and school age children up to 10 years of age, there is paucity of Indian data for penile and testicular parameters particularly in pubertal years.[23]”

    From Stretched Penile Length and Testicular Size from Birth to 18 Years in Boys from Western Maharashtra (2019) · cites this paper as [23]

    The discussion of penile length and growth parameters says that very few studies have examined penile length after the neonatal period, and the References list a study of South Indian newborns. The paper does not establish a paucity of Indian data specifically for pubertal penile and testicular parameters, or describe Indian data extending to age 10. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Lee PA, Mazur T, Danish R, et al. Micropenis I. Criteria, etiologies and classification. Johns Hopkins Med J 1980; 146: 156-163.
  2. Prader A. Testicular size: assessment and clinical importance. Triangle 1966; 7: 240-243.
  3. Sutan-Assin M, Rukman J, Dahlan A. Penile dimensions of newborn infants. Paediatr Indones 1989; 29: 146- 150.
  4. Phillip M, De Boer C, Pilpel D, Karplus M, Sofer S. Clitoral and penile sizes of full term newborns in two different ethnic groups. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 1996; 9: 175-179.
  5. Ting TH, Wu LL. Penile length of term newborn infants in multiracial Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2009; 50: 817-821.
  6. Chin T, Liu C, Wei C. Testicular volume in Taiwanese boys. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) 1998; 61: 29-33.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Semiz, S., Küçüktaşçı, K., Zencir, M., & Sevinç, Ö.
Affiliations
  • Pamukkale University (TR)
  • Departments of Pediatrics, Pamukkale University Faculty of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey
Venue
The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2011-12-25
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
661-665
ISSN
  • 0041-4301 (ISSN-L)
  • 2791-6421
OpenAlex
W190254397
Cited by
14
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
penile length, testicular volume, neonates, male infants, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, minipuberty, ethnic differences, birth weight, linear growth
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Penis, Reference Books, Testis, Turkey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review