Cited by 65Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

Prototype Propagation Networks (PPN) for Weakly-supervised Few-shot Learning on Category Graph

Open access
Liu, Lu, Zhou, Tianyi, Long, Guodong, Jiang, Jing, Yao, Lina, Zhang, Chengqi·2019·Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

A variety of machine learning applications expect to achieve rapid learning from a limited number of labeled data. However, the success of most current models is the result of heavy training on big data. Meta-learning addresses this problem by extracting common knowledge across different tasks that can be quickly adapted to new tasks. However, they do not fully explore weakly-supervised information, which is usually free or cheap to collect. In this paper, we show that weakly-labeled data can significantly improve the performance of meta-learning on few-shot classification. We propose prototype propagation network (PPN) trained on few-shot tasks together with data annotated by coarse-label. Given a category graph of the targeted fine-classes and some weakly-labeled coarse-classes, PPN learns an attention mechanism which propagates the prototype of one class to another on the graph, so that the K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier defined on the propagated prototypes results in high accuracy across different few-shot tasks. The training tasks are generated by subgraph sampling, and the training objective is obtained by accumulating the level-wise classification loss on the subgraph. On two benchmarks, PPN significantly outperforms most recent few-shot learning methods in different settings, even when they are also allowed to train on weakly-labeled data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2019/418

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [Chen et al. , 2019] Wei-Yu Chen, Yen-Cheng Liu, Zsolt Liu, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, and Jia-Bin Huang. A closer look at few-shot classification. In ICLR , 2019.
  2. [Veliˇ ckovi´ c et al. , 2018] Petar Veliˇ ckovi´ c, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio, and Yoshua Bengio. Graph attention networks. In ICLR , 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Zhou, T., Long, G., Jiang, J., Yao, L., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2019-08
Pages
3015-3022
OpenAlex
W2944206301
Cited by
65
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.78
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Australian Government
  • Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government (LP150100671)
  • Australian Research Council (LP160100630, LP150100671)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
few-shot learning, weakly supervised learning, meta-learning, graph attention mechanism, subgraph sampling, k-nearest neighbors, few-shot classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review