Cited by 17Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Abstraction for Deep Reinforcement Learning

Open access
Shanahan, Murray, Mitchell, Melanie·2022·Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

We characterise the problem of abstraction in the context of deep reinforcement learning. Various well established approaches to analogical reasoning and associative memory might be brought to bear on this issue, but they present difficulties because of the need for end-to-end differentiability. We review developments in AI and machine learning that could facilitate their adoption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24963/ijcai.2022/780

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An LLM encodes knowledge in the way an encyclopedia does, and one emergent property is that it encodes everyday-world knowledge that no encyclopedia captures.

    “it can reasonably be claimed that one emergent property of an LLM is that it encodes kinds of knowledge of the everyday world and the way it works that no encyclopedia captures.18”

    From Talking about Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]

    Section 3.5, “Abstraction Through Language” (page unavailable), discusses large language models as a possible route to abstraction and notes GPT-3’s few-shot generalisation. It does not say that LLMs encode everyday-world knowledge unavailable in encyclopedias. I searched our copy for the encyclopedia comparison and for LLMs’ commonsense knowledge. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. John J. Hopfield. Hopfield network. Schol- arpedia, 2(5):1977, 2007.
  2. George Lakoff and Mark John- son. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  3. Gary F Marcus. The Algebraic Mind. MIT Press, 2001.
  4. Roger C. Schank and Robert P. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry Into Human Knowledge Structures. Psychology Press, 1977.
  5. Pedro A Tsividis, Thomas Pouncy, Jacqueline L Xu, Joshua B Tenenbaum, and Samuel J Ger- shman. Human learning in Atari. In AAAI Spring Sympo- sium on Science of Intelligence: Computational Principles of Natural and Artificial Intelligence, 2017.
  6. Mark Turner. The Literary Mind: The Origins of Thought and Language. Oxford University Press, 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shanahan, M., & Mitchell, M.
Affiliations
  • Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Santa Fe Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shanahan, Murray
Venue
Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Published
2022-07
Pages
5588-5596
OpenAlex
W4285606041
Cited by
17
References
61
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
abstraction, deep reinforcement learning, analogical reasoning, associative memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review