Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence in education
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming various aspects of society, including education. Understanding teachers' perspectives on this disruptive technology is essential, given its potential to revolutionize the teaching and learning process. A comprehensive study involving 74 educators utilized the Opinion Scale on Artificial Intelligence in Education to gather valuable insights. The research outcomes reveal a predominantly favourable view of AI in education, albeit accompanied by significant apprehensions regarding ethical and privacy-related issues. This study contributes significantly to the ongoing discourse on the role of AI in education, emphasizing the necessity for a balanced approach that maximizes the benefits of AI while ensuring the protection of the rights and interests of all stakeholders.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teachers who understand AI concepts and applications are more likely to recognize the benefits of GenAI, such as personalized learning and efficient student assessment, and therefore perceive these technologies as more useful.
“Teachers who understand AI concepts and applications are more likely to recognize the benefits of GenAI, such as personalized learning and efficient student assessment, and therefore perceive these technologies as more useful [45,51].”
From Modeling teachers’ acceptance of generative artificial intelligence use in higher education: the role of AI literacy, intelligent TPACK, and perceived trust (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Chounta, I., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2021) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Chiu, T. K. F., & Chai, C.-S. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145568 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
Hinojo-Lucena, F.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M.-P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9010051 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Creation and Evaluation of a Pretertiary Artificial Intelligence (AI) Curriculum
Chiu, T. K. F., Meng, H., Chai, C.-S., King, I., Wong, S., & Yam, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2021.3085878 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
“Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education,”
Alam, A. (2021) · 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) · doi:10.1109/iccica52458.2021.9697272 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.755914 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Zhao, L., Wu, X., & Luo, H. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114549 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and school leadership: challenges, opportunities and implications
Fullan, M., Azorín, C., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2024) · School Leadership & Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2023.2246856 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Teachers’ perspective on artificial intelligence education: An initial investigation
Polak, S., Schiavo, G., & Zancanaro, M. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts · doi:10.1145/3491101.3519866 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Athanassopoulos, S., Manoli, P., Gouvi, M., Lavidas, K., & Komis, V. (2023) · Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research · doi:10.25082/amler.2023.02.009 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
ANOVA and the variance homogeneity assumption: Exploring a better gatekeeper
Kim, Y. J., & Cribbie, R. A. (2017) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12103 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Karaköse, T., Tülübaş, T., Papadakis, S., & Yirci, R. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13070708 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Some critical and ethical perspectives on the empirical turn of AI interpretability
John-Mathews, J.-M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121209 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Karakose, T., Demirkol, M., Aslan, N., Köse, H., & Yirci, R. (2023) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.22521/edupij.2023.123.1 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
KARACA, A., & Kilcan, B. (2023) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.23.64.10.4 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Individualizing Learning Using Intelligent Technology and Universally Designed Curriculum
Abell, M. M. (2006) · Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College) · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Papadakis, S., Семеріков, С. О., Єчкало, Ю. В., et al. (2023) · doi:10.31812/123456789/8483 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Akgun, S., & Greenhow, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: Addressing Societal and Ethical Challenges in K-12 Settings. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-ICLS 2022, pp. 1373-1376. International Society of the Learning Sciences.
- Alam, A. (2021). Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In 2021 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Applications (ICCICA) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
- Papadakis, S. J., Semerikov, S. O., Yechkalo, Y. V., Velychko, V. Y., Vakaliuk, T. A., Amelina, S. M., ... & Tkachuk, V. V. (2023). Advancing lifelong learning and professional development through ICT: insights from the 3L-Person 2023 workshop. In Proceedings of the 3L-Person 2023 workshop, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine, October 25, 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111209 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Tripathi, T., Sharma, S. R., Singh, V., Bhargava, P., & Raj, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1651217 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
- Authors
- Uygun, D.
- Affiliations
- Mi̇lli̇ Eği̇ti̇m Bakanliği (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Uygun, Derya
- ORCID
- Uygun, Derya
- Venue
- Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research
- Publisher
- Syncsci Publishing Pte., Ltd.
- Published
- 2024-03-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 931-939
- ISSN
- 2737-5676 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4392559040
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 13
- FWCI
- 37.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, teacher perceptions, AI adoption in schools, ethical considerations, privacy concerns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
