The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications
Abstract
Two new two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models will be presented.They combine different elements of existing models that are considered superior to their alternatives.The first model, referred to as the baseline (BSL) model, utilizes the original k-u model of Wilcox in the inner region of the boundary layer and switches to the standard A>e model in the outer region and in free shear flows.It has a performance similar to the Wilcox model, but avoids that model's strong freestream sensitivity.The second model results from a modification to the definition of the eddy-viscosity in the BSL model, which accounts for the effect of the transport of the principal turbulent shear stress.The new model is called the shear-stress transport-model and leads to major improvements in the prediction of adverse pressure gradient flows.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Most probably the most significant advantage of the k -w formulation is that it does not involve damping functions like the k -# model, thereby being numerically more robust and simplifying the implementation of boundary conditions [227].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [227]
In the citing paper
“The turbulent viscosity is highly depending on the value of w specified outside of the boundary layer, like, for instance at the inlet [227].”
From Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review (2022) · cites this paper as [227]
Citations
Cites
Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models
Wilcox, D. C. (1988) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.10041 · Cited by 3,125
Zonal Two Equation k-w Turbulence Models For Aerodynamic Flows
Menter, F. (1993) · AIAA Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics and Lasers Conference · doi:10.2514/6.1993-2906 · Cited by 2,851
Self-citationLaunder, B. E., & Sharma, B. I. (1974) · Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer · doi:10.1016/0094-4548(74)90150-7 · Cited by 2,794
Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channelflow
Driver, D. M., & Seegmiller, H. L. (1985) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.8890 · Cited by 699
Influence of freestream values on k-omega turbulence model predictions
Menter, F. R. (1992) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.11115 · Cited by 426
Self-citationRodi, W. (1991) · AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting · doi:10.2514/6.1991-216 · Cited by 366
Johnson, D. A., & King, L. S. (1985) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.9152 · Cited by 365
Comparison of two-equation turbulence models for boundary layers with pressure gradient
Wilcox, D. C. (1993) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.11790 · Cited by 332
Performance of popular turbulence model for attached and separated adverse pressure gradient flows
Menter, F. R. (1992) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.11180 · Cited by 259
Self-citationFlying-Hot-wire Study of Flow Past an NACA 4412 Airfoil at Maximum Lift
Coles, D., & Wadcock, A. J. (1979) · AIAA Journal · doi:10.2514/3.61127 · Cited by 254
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Huang P. G., 1992, NASA TM-103882
- Rogers S. E., 1993, private communication. NASA Ames
- Menter F. R., 1993, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Measurements, 229
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,005 of 1,005
Modeling and Simulation of Photobioreactors with Computational Fluid Dynamics—A Comprehensive Review
Luzi, G., & McHardy, C. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15113966 · Cited by 44
Zuo, Z. Q., Sun, P. J., Jiang, W. B., Qin, X. J., Li, P., & Huang, Y. H. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.241 · Cited by 34
Luzi, G., McHardy, C., Lindenberger, C., Rauh, C., & Delgado, A. (2019) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.101404 · Cited by 24
Numerical analysis of the effects of air on light distribution in a bubble column photobioreactor
McHardy, C., Luzi, G., Lindenberger, C., Agudo, J. R., Delgado, A., & Rauh, C. (2018) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.016 · Cited by 25
Gaedtke, M., Hoffmann, T., Reinhardt, V., Thäter, G., Nirschl, H., & Krause, M. J. (2019) · International Journal of Modern Physics C · doi:10.1142/s012918311950013x · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Menter, F. R.
- Affiliations
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Menter, F. R.
- Venue
- AIAA Journal
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1598-1605
- ISSN
- 0001-1452 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-385X
- OpenAlex
- W1974097079
- Cited by
- 21,593
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2084 · 2025: 1886 · 2024: 1871 · 2023: 1823 · 2022: 1676 · 2021: 1500 · 2020: 1346 · 2019: 1281 · 2018: 1133 · 2017: 1011 · 2016: 907 · 2015: 808 · 2014: 739 · 2013: 560 · 2012: 585
- FWCI
- 16.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIAA Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization
- Keywords
- k-omega turbulence model, Wilcox k-omega model, shear stress transport turbulence model, boundary layer turbulence, free shear flow
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
