Cited by 2Food Safety and HygieneSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

The effect of food safety education on the knowledge attitude and behavior of foodservice workers of inner city public schools

Open access
Craggs-Dino, Lillian·2017

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if food safety education influences food safety knowledge, attitude and behavior among inner city public school foodservice employees. Knowledge, attitude and behavior of an experimental group (n=22) was assessed before and after 3-hour food safety training and compared with a control group (n=10) that received no food safety training. We hypothesized that those who received food safety training would have improved knowledge, attitude and behavior towards food safety issues compared to those who did not receive training. Results showed that food safety training significantly increased (p<0.001) the knowledge of foodservice employees compared to those who didn’t receive the training. However, the 3-hour training did not significantly influence attitude or practice of safe food-handling techniques. Education and consistent re-training, coupled with Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) system, food-handier sanitation certification and frequent supervision may help to increase food safety awareness among foodservice employees.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25148/etd.fi14061535

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. * Olsen Sonja J, MacKinnon Linda C, Goulding Joy S, Bean Nancy H, Slutsker Laurence. Surveillance for food bome-disease outbreaks-United States, 1993-1997. MMWR M orbid M ortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49:1 -53.
  2. Levine WC, Smart JF, Archer DL, Bean NH, Tauxe RV. Foodbome disease outbreaks in nursing homes, 1975 through 1987. JAMA. 1991 ;266(15):2105-2109.
  3. Massoudi Mehran S, Bell Beth, Paredes Valentine, Insko Judy, Evans Karen, Shapiro Craig N. An outbreak of hepatitis A associated with an infected food-handier. Pub Health Reports. 1999;114:157-164.
  4. Rodrigue Daniel C, Mast Eric E, Greene Katherine D, Davis Jeffrey P, Hutchinson Margaret A, Wells Joy G, Barrett Timothy J, Griffin Patricia M. A university outbreak of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 infections associated with roast beef and an unusually benign clinical course. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:1122-1125.
  5. Alketmse SF, Street DA, Fein SB, Levy AS. Consumer knowledge of foodbome microbial hazards and food-handling practices. J Food Prot. 1996;59(3):287-294.
  6. Angelillo IF, Viggiani NM, Rizzo L, Bianco A. Food handlers and foodbome diseases: knowledge, attitudes and reported behavior in Italy. JFoodProt. 2000;63(3):381-385.
  7. Special report on selected notifiable disease in the United States, 1994. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1994;43(53): 19-22.
  8. M M W R Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000;49(10):201-211.
  9. CDC Surveillance Summaries preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of food bome illnesses: selected sites, United States, 2001. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51(15):325-329.
  10. Bryan Frank L. Impact of food bome disease and methods of evaluating control programs. JEnv Health. 1978;40(60):315-323.
  11. CDC Surveillance Summaries foodbome diseases active surveillance network, 1996. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1997;46:258-261.
  12. Notices. Federal Register. August 16, 1991;56:40897-40898.
  13. Bean NH, Griffin PM, Goulding JS, Ivey CB. Foodbome disease outbreaks, 5-year summary, 1983-1987. MMWR Morbid Mortal Wkly Rep. 1990;39:15-57.
  14. Brockmann Robert A, Lenaway Dennis D, Humphrey Charles D. Norwalk-like viral gastroenteritis: a large outbreak on a university campus. J Env Health 1995;57(10): 19-22.
  15. Bodager Dean, lackow George R. Outbreak of gastrointestinal illness associated with food served at a wedding reception. FI J E m Health. 2 0 0 1 ; 172:8-11.
  16. Guest Charles, Spitalny Kenneth C, Madore H Paul, Pray Katherine, Dolin Raphael, Herrmann John E, Blacklow Neil R. Food bome snow mountain agent gastroenteritis in school cafeteria. Pediatrics. 1987;79(4):559-563.
  17. Bryan FL. Risk assessment of foodservice establishments in communities. JFood Prot 1982;45:93-100.
  18. Woteki Catherine E, Facinoli Sandra L, Schor Danielle. Keeping food safe to eat; healthful food must be safe as well as nutritious. JNutr. 2001;131:502S-509S.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craggs-Dino, L.
Published
2002-06-28
OpenAlex
W2573144257
Cited by
2
References
29
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
Type
dissertation
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food safety education, food service workers, school foodservice, food safety knowledge, food safety attitudes, food safety behavior, food handling, HACCP

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review