The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs
Abstract
Environmentally induced stereotypies, commonly observed in farm and zoo animals, are behaviors that are relatively invariant, that are regularly repeated, and that serve no obvious function. However, there is as yet no accepted means of discriminating between normal and abnormal behavior, and the assumption that stereotypies are abnormal may mask the fact that they arise in part through processes that "normally" control behavior. There is growing evidence that stereotypies in sows and broiler breeders are strongly related to feeding motivation. For example, sows only develop oral stereotypies if their feed intake is restricted, and operant conditioning experiments have shown commercial levels of feed restriction to give rise to high levels of feeding motivation. Stereotypies in animals whose feed intake is restricted largely occur in the postprandial period, and ingestion of food has specifically been shown to elicit stereotypies in sows. These observations suggest that positive feedback from feeding produces a short-term increase in feeding motivation that at the end of the meal is directed toward available, alternative stimuli such as chains, the choice of stimuli reflecting the sensory feedback from the activity. Drinking behavior may also become an expression of feeding behavior after metabolic water requirements are met. In addition to these processes specific to feeding motivation, it seems likely that nonspecific processes, which operate more generally across motivational systems, contribute to the persistence of the behavior. Behavioral arousal may facilitate performance of active behaviors, and sensitization of the underlying neural elements may lead to the behavior being more easily elicited and maintained. A crucial factor in the sensitization process would seem to be the channeling of complex behavior by the environment into a few and very often repeated sequences of behavior. This approach suggests that stereotypies can be prevented by either reducing the level of motivation underlying the stereotypy, or by allowing for the expression of more complex behavior and thereby preventing the processes of channeling and sensitization from occurring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breland, K., & Breland, M. (1961) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0040090 · Cited by 1,181
Variations in the Sensitivity of Instrumental Responding to Reinforcer Devaluation
Adams, C. D. (1982) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B · doi:10.1080/14640748208400878 · Cited by 609
The notion of ethological ‘need’, models of motivation and animal welfare
Hughes, B. O., & Duncan, I. J. H. (1988) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80110-6 · Cited by 514
Reticulo-cortical activity and behavior: A critique of the arousal theory and a new synthesis
Vanderwolf, C. H., & Robinson, T. E. (1981) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00009869 · Cited by 411
Foraging and reinforcement schedules in the pigeon: Optimal and non-optimal aspects of choice
Lea, S. E. G. (1979) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90025-3 · Cited by 315
Symposium on “Indices to Measure Animal Well-Being”
Dantzer, R. (1986) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1986.6261776x · Cited by 271
Arousal: Its genesis and manifestation as response rate.
Killeen, P. R., Hanson, S. J., & Osborne, S. R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.85.6.571 · Cited by 240
Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts
Appleby, M. C., & Lawrence, A. B. (1987) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s0003356100036680 · Cited by 233
Self-citationInfluences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows
Terlouw, E. M. C., Lawrence, A. B., & Illius, A. W. (1991) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80151-4 · Cited by 221
Self-citationThe effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls
Fraser, D. (1975) · Animal Science · doi:10.1017/s0003356100030415 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments
Newberry, R. C. (1995) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/0168-1591(95)00616-z · Cited by 1,112
Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator?
Mason, G., & Latham, N. (2004) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s096272860001438x · Cited by 718
Tail-biting: A new perspective
Taylor, N. R., Main, D. C. J., Mendl, M., & Edwards, S. A. (2010) · The Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.08.028 · Cited by 327
Scientific assessment of animal welfare
Hemsworth, P., Mellor, D., Cronin, G., & Tilbrook, A. (2015) · New Zealand Veterinary Journal · doi:10.1080/00480169.2014.966167 · Cited by 252
Swaisgood, R. R. (2007) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.027 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2815-2825
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W42277180
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 12.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1993.71102815x
- The paper
- Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (1993). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.