Cited by 184Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education

Current status and future directions of applied behavioral research for animal welfare and conservation

Swaisgood, Ronald R.·2007·Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.027

Cites

158 of 158 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swaisgood, R. R.
Affiliations
Zoological Society of San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Swaisgood, Ronald R.
Venue
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
102
Issue
3-4
Pages
139-162
ISSN
0168-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009670072
Cited by
184
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Animal Behaviour Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
Keywords
animal welfare, conservation behavior, captive breeding, ex situ conservation, in situ conservation, environmental enrichment, captive release, translocation, welfare theory, social organization, mate choice, habitat fragmentation, human disturbance, human-wildlife conflict, dispersal, habitat selection, reserve design, ecological corridors, stress, decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review