The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures.
Abstract
Mixed linear models were developed by animal breeders to evaluate genetic potential of bulls. Application of mixed models has recently spread to all areas of research, spurred by availability of advanced computer software. Previously, mixed model analyses were implemented by adapting fixed-effect methods to models with random effects. This imposed limitations on applicability because the covariance structure was not modeled. This is the case with PROC GLM in the SAS System. Recent versions of the SAS System include PROC MIXED. This procedure implements random effects in the statistical model and permits modeling the covariance structure of the data. Thereby, PROC MIXED can compute efficient estimates of fixed effects and valid standard errors of the estimates. Modeling the covariance structure is especially important for analysis of repeated measures data because measurements taken close in time are potentially more highly correlated than those taken far apart in time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of garlic oil and four of its compounds on rumen microbial fermentation
Busquet, M., Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Carro, M. D., & Kamel, C. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73126-x · Cited by 273
Dohleman, F. G., Heaton, E. A., Arundale, R. A., & Long, S. P. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01153.x · Cited by 175
Clarke, G., Kelleher, C., Hornbrook, M., DeBar, L., Dickerson, J., & Gullion, C. (2009) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506070802675353 · Cited by 154
Buccioni, A., Pauselli, M., Viti, C., Minieri, S., Pallara, G., Roscini, V., Rapaccini, S., Marinucci, M. T., Lupi, P., Conte, G., et al. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2014-8651 · Cited by 164
Sutphen, C. L., McCue, L., Herries, E. M., Xiong, C., Ladenson, J. H., Holtzman, D. M., Fagan, A. M., & On behalf of, A. D. N. I. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.012 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R., & Ammerman, C. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1216
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W85196187
- Cited by
- 2,825
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1998.7641216x
- The paper
- Littell, R. C., Henry, P. R., & Ammerman, C. B. (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7641216x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.