Bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle: Environmental, genetic, and economic factors
Abstract
The objective of this study was to characterize genetic, environmental, and economic factors related to the incidence of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) in feedlot calves. Records from 18,112 calves representing 9 breeds (Angus, Braunvieh, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Hereford, Limousin, Pinzgauer, Red Poll, and Simmental) and 3 composite types (MARC I, MARC II, and MARC III) over a 15-yr period (1987 to 2001) were evaluated. Disease incidence was observed and recorded by station veterinary and technical staff. The incidence of BRD varied across years, with the annual observed incidence ranging from 5 to 44%. From 1987 to 1992, the annual average incidence generally exceeded 20%. However, in later years the annual incidence did not exceed 14%. The epidemiological pattern indicated that BRD infection increased dramatically after 5 d on feed and remained high until approximately 80 d on feed. Previous BRD infection during the preweaning period did not influence subsequent BRD infection in the feedlot. Steers were more likely to become sick with BRD than heifers; castration before entry in the feedlot may be a predisposing cause. Few significant differences among breeds were detected for BRD incidence. Adjusted solutions from mixed model analyses indicated that Herefords were generally more susceptible to BRD infection (P < 0.05) than MARC I and III composite types. Composite breed types had similar susceptibility compared with other purebred breeds. Mortality associated with BRD was greatest in Red Poll calves (9%) compared with the average over all breeds (4%). Estimates of heritability for resistance to BRD ranged from 0.04 to 0.08 +/- 0.01. When the observed heritability was transformed to an underlying continuous scale, the estimate increased to 0.18. Selection for resistance to BRD could be effective if phenotypes for BRD resistance were known. Thus, development of an inexpensive and humane method of challenging animals with BRD to determine resistance would be an important step in reducing the incidence of BRD. This study also demonstrated that producer-collected field data could be used for selection against this disease. The economic loss associated with lower gains and treatment costs for BRD infection in a 1,000-cattle feedlot was estimated as dollar 13.90 per animal, not including labor and associated handling costs.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The actual incidence of BRD may be higher than reported since one-third of calves exhibited extensive pneumonia at necropsy without a prior diagnosis.
“Notwithstanding these figures, the actual incidence of BRD may be higher than reported since one-third of calves exhibited extensive pneumonia at necropsy without a prior diagnosis [128,129].”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [128]
The Results and Discussion (page not provided) says that distinguishing healthy from sick animals is not always accurate and that disease may not be detected in all susceptible populations. That supports the possibility that reported BRD incidence is too low, but the paper does not report that one-third of calves had extensive pneumonia at necropsy without a prior diagnosis. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe occurrence of BRD in feedlot calves aligns with an average prevalence rate of 17.0%, although estimates range from 4.6% to 43.8%.
“The occurrence of BRD in feedlot calves aligns with an average prevalence rate of 17.0%, although estimates range from 4.6% to 43.8%.”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [128]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The Immunology of the Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex
Ellis, J. A. (2001) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30005-0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Bretschneider, G. 2005. Effects of age and method of castration on performance and stress response of beef male cattle: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 97:89-100.
- Faber, R., N. Hartwig, D. Busby, and R. BreDahl. 1999. The costs and predictive factors of bovine respiratory disease in standardized steer tests. A. S. Leaflet R1648. 1999 Beef Research Report. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
- Gregory, K. E., L. V. Cundiff, and R. M. Koch. 1999. Composite Breeds to Use Heterosis and Breed Differences to Improve Efficiency of Beef Production. Technical Bulletin. No. 1875. ARS-USDA, Clay Center, NE.
- Ishmael, W. 2001. Gasping for dollars. Angus Beef Bulletin. Angus Productions Inc., St. Joseph, MO, 64506. Available: http:// www.angusbeefbulletin.com/ArticlePDF/ 0901abb\_ GaspingforDollars.pdf Accessed Sep. 23, 2005.
- Mallard, B. A., B. N. Wilkie, B. W. Kennedy, J. Gibson, and M. Quinton. 1998. Immune responsiveness in swine: Eight generations of selection for high and low immune response in Yorkshire pigs. Proc. 6th World Congr. Gene. Appl. Livest. Prod., Armidale, Australia XXVII:257-262.
- Smith, R. A. 1998. Impact of disease on feedlot performance: a review. J. Anim. Sci. 76:272-274.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bacterial Pathogens of the Bovine Respiratory Disease Complex
Griffin, D., Chengappa, M. M., Kuszak, J., & McVey, D. S. (2010) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.04.004 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Schaefer, A. L., Cook, N. J., Bench, C., Chabot, J. B., Colyn, J., Liu, T., Okine, E. K., Stewart, M., & Webster, J. R. (2012) · Research in Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.09.021 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production
Cameron, A., & McAllister, T. A. (2016) · Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s40104-016-0127-3 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
“Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) is the most frequent and economically important of the primary cattle diseases [89].”
BackgroundInfluentialPardon, B., Hostens, M., Duchateau, L., Dewulf, J., De Bleecker, K., & Deprez, P. (2013) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/1746-6148-9-79 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Prevalence of respiratory disorders in veal calves and potential risk factors
Brscic, M., Leruste, H., Heutinck, L. F. M., Bokkers, E. A. M., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., Stockhofe, N., Gottardo, F., Lensink, B. J., Cozzi, G., & Van Reenen, C. G. (2012) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2011-4699 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Johnson, K. K., & Pendell, D. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00189 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Notwithstanding these figures, the actual incidence of BRD may be higher than reported since one-third of calves exhibited extensive pneumonia at necropsy without a prior diagnosis [128,129].”
BackgroundEvaluating potential biomarkers of health and performance in veal calves
Marcato, F., van den Brand, H., Kemp, B., & van Reenen, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2018.00133 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Development of a Clinical Scoring System for Bovine Respiratory Disease in Weaned Dairy Calves
Maier, G. U., Rowe, J. D., Lehenbauer, T. W., Karle, B. M., Williams, D. R., Champagne, J. D., & Aly, S. S. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15474 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Biomarkers for Prediction of Bovine Respiratory Disease Outcome
Aich, P., Babiuk, L. A., Potter, A. A., & Griebel, P. (2009) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2009.0012 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
How stress alters immune responses during respiratory infection
Griebel, P., Hill, K., & Stookey, J. (2014) · Animal Health Research Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1466252314000280 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Predictive Modeling of Bovine Respiratory Disease Outcomes in Feedlot Cattle: A Narrative Review
Wisnieski, L., Amrine, D. E., & Renter, D. G. (2021) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104666 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
- Authors
- Snowder, G. D., Van Vleck, L. D., Cundiff, L. V., & Bennett, G. L.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Snowder, G. D.
- ORCID
- Bennett, G. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1999-2008
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W1976668103
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
- Keywords
- bovine respiratory disease, feedlot cattle, disease incidence, breed differences, disease resistance selection, castration, disease mortality, economic losses, beef cattle, environmental factors, disease resistance screening, treatment costs, beef cattle breeds, Hereford
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Female, Male, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Risk Factors, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review