The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shackled to the Status Quo: The Inhibiting Effects of Incumbent System Habit, Switching Costs, and Inertia on New System Acceptance
Abstract
Given that adoption of a new system often implies fully or partly replacing an incumbent system, resistance is often manifested as failure of a user to switch from an incumbent technology to a newly introduced one. Thus, a potential source of resistance to adopting a new system lies in the use of an incumbent system. Using the status quo bias and habit literatures as theoretical lenses, the study explains how use of an incumbent system negatively impacts new system perceptions and usage intentions. We argue that habitual use of an incumbent system, rationalization due to perceived transition costs, and psychological commitment due to perceived sunk costs all encourage development of inertia. Inertia in turn fully mediates the impact of these incumbent system constructs on constructs related to acceptance of the new system via psychological commitment based on cognitive consistency and by increasing the importance of normative pressures. Specifically, we hypothesize that inertia leads to decreased perceptions of the ease of use and relative advantage of a newly introduced system and has a negative impact on intentions to use the new system, above and beyond its impact through perceptions. Finally, we hypothesize that inertia moderates the relationship between subjective norm and intention, such that normative pressures to use a new system become more important in the presence of inertia. Empirical results largely support the hypothesized relationships showing the inhibiting effect of incumbent-system habit, transition and sunk costs, and inertia on acceptance of a new system. Our study thus extends theoretical understanding of the role of incumbent system constructs such as habit and inertia in technology acceptance, and lays the foundations for further study of the interplay between perceptions and cognition with respect to the incumbent system and those with respect to a new system.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared with the decision to retain a premium subscription, the decision to upgrade represents a departure from the users' status quo”
From What drives subscribing to premium in freemium services? A consumer value‐based view of differences between upgrading to and staying with premium (2020) · cites this paper as Polites & Karahanna, 2012
In the citing paper
“While the intention to retain the premium subscription essentially means continuance of an existing behavior, the intention to upgrade from free to the premium subscription means a departure from the user's status quo (Kim & Kankanhalli, 2009;Polites & Karahanna, 2012).”
From What drives subscribing to premium in freemium services? A consumer value‐based view of differences between upgrading to and staying with premium (2020) · cites this paper as Polites & Karahanna, 2012
In the citing paper
“Moreover, inertia can be divided into two distinct measures: first, cognitive inertia and second, affective inertia (Greenfield 2005; Polites and Karahanna 2012).”
From Health insurance policy renewal: an exploration of reputation, performance, and affect to understand customer inertia (2022) · cites this paper as Polites and Karahanna 2012
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–896 of 896
Continuance Use Intention of Mobile Internet Services
Khedhaouria, A., & Beldi, A. (2017) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1868-6.ch010
I-O Psychology and Technology: Why Reinvent the Wheel?
Howard, M. C., Travers, S. D., Marshall, C. J., & Cogswell, J. E. (2017) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2017.73
User Switching to Cloud Service: A Status Quo Bias Perspective
Park, S.-C. (2017) · Journal of Korea Service Management Society · doi:10.15706/jksms.2017.18.4.007
Coping with technology heritage A case study of a large telecommunications organization
Johansson, M. M., & Sundqvist, J. (2017)
Rinta-Kahila, T., Penttinen, E., & Pääsky, H.-P. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.487
“Those traditional checkout users who had no prior experience in SCO use clearly exhibited inertia in technology adoption [25] – the reason for not using SCOs was, paradoxically, often reported to stem from the lack of prior SCO use.”
BackgroundSatisfaction and Continuous Use Intention of Internet-only Banks
Kim, H. J., & Lee, S. S. (2019) · Family and environment research · doi:10.6115/fer.2019.001
“소비자들의 신서비스 사용 행동에 대한 연구들을 살펴보면, 주관 적 규범이 서비스에 이용 의도 뿐만 아니라(Lu et al., 2005) 서비 스의 만족도를 증가시키는 요인으로 확인되었으며(Fan, Chung, & Moon, 2018), 지속 사용 의도에도 중요한 영향을 미치는 촉진 요인으로 확인되었다(Kim, 2011; Polites & Karahanna, 2012).”
Sensemaking processes and stakeholders' reactions to IT implementation
Rahighi, A. (2018) · Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) · doi:10.25916/sut.26279506
Understanding Push and Pull Powers on Intention to Accept for 3D printer
Tsao, W.-Y. (2019) · International Journal of Human Resource Studies · doi:10.5296/ijhrs.v9i2.14863
“Inertia [six items from authors Lee and Neale (2012) and Polites and Karahanna (2012) to evaluate the degree of people attitudinal propensity to maintain the current state, seven-point Likert type scale] 1.”
BackgroundWhy Do Laggards Resist the IT Adoption in Public Service?: A Case of Expressway Hi-Pass System
Cho, H.-S., Suh, Y., Lee, S., & Lee, S.-B. (2019) · Journal of the Korean society for quality management · doi:10.7469/jksqm.2019.47.2.367
“…price of the On Board Unit is perceived as unfair Dodd et al.(1991) Status Quo Inertia degree of intention to continue using the current method Polites and Karahanna(2012) Need of Ensuring Publicness degree of expectation that the current method should be maintained to ensure the rights of…”
What Makes User Switch Technology?
Prahara, H., Hidayanto, A. N., & Hapsari, I. C. (2019) · International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology (DSIT) · doi:10.1145/3352411.3352426
“Research by [5] define inertia in the context of information systems as a stickiness between users and incumbent systems, so users will continue to use the system, although there are better alternatives or incentives when users switch to other systems.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe Unintended Consequences of Industry Mandates: How EMV is Changing the U.S. Payments Landscape
Thrasher, J. (2018) · TUScholarShare (Temple University)
Feng, Y., Tam, K. Y., Lai, M. C. L., & Li, S. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3820280
Mohajeri, K. (2014) · VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) · doi:10.25772/t34q-yc79
“In line with Kim and Kankanhalli (2009), there is another study by Polites and Karahanna (2012) that focuses on the notion of “status quo.””
BackgroundMethodInfluentialContinuance Use Intention of Mobile Internet Services
Khedhaouria, A., & Beldi, A. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1933-1.ch033
Recker, J. (2021) · Progress in IS · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85436-2_4
Impelling versus Impeding Effects on Customer Purchase in a Social Media-Embedded ChannelPreprint
Wang, J., Huang, Q., Liu, H., & Tan, Y. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3981765
Recker, J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30048-6_4
Crow, K. (2022) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.236971
Huang, L. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM) · doi:10.1109/ieem55944.2022.9989641
“According to Polites and Karahanna [17], inertia consists of three components: affective-based inertia, behavioral-based inertia, and cognitive-based inertia.”
BackgroundMethodSastyawan, M. W. R., Soesanto, L., Purwanggono, B., & Bakhtiar, A. (2022) · Proceeding of The International Conference on Business and Economics · doi:10.56444/icbeuntagsmg.v1i1.292
Exploring Factors Influencing The Acceptance of Community Service Web Application
Yuniarty, Y., Sriwidadi, T., Ngatindriatun, Wijaya, D. I., Desak, G. F. P., Sukmandhani, A. A., Sari, N., & Marsintauli, F. (2022) · International Conference on Data Analytics for Business and Industry (ICDABI) · doi:10.1109/icdabi56818.2022.10041257
“According to the status quo bias theory, inertia refers to a person's tendency to persist with established behavioral patterns (e.g., a habit of usage) or previous decisions rather than exploring better possibilities [7].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialERP Retirement: Some Considerations on Existing Literature
Albanese, M. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing and Economics · doi:10.2478/ejme-2023-0002
Satisfying the patient journey: optimal service configuration for online health service platformsPreprint
Jia, L., Ying, L., Zeyu, P., & David, Y. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2929543/v1
Seitz, J., & Doblinger, C. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4590210
Hwang, J. (2023) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/97054
Li, J., Lu, Y., Peng, Z. C., & Yen, D. C. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research · doi:10.1080/15228053.2023.2298103
“For example, the users should have some learning effort associated with additional time and energy spending if they decide to try a new website (Polites & Karahanna, 2012).”
BackgroundEmbracing Smart Retailing Systems: An Integrated Model
Hung, S., Jian, J.-H., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2024) · Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) · doi:10.23919/picmet64035.2024.10653387
“Former scholars applied the status quo bias theory to elucidate how inertia and switching costs inhibit users from embracing new systems [25].”
BackgroundLi, C., Yang, Y., Li, S., Wu, X., & Xin, H. (2024) · Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing · doi:10.1080/1051712x.2024.2403472
Analysis of Switching Behavior of Buy Now Pay Later Product Users Using Push Pull Mooring Framework
Yuliyanti, T., & Champaca, M. (2024) · EKONIKA Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri · doi:10.30737/ekonika.v9i2.5751
Righi, H. (2024) · Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · doi:10.18162/ritpu-2024-v21n3-05
Jalo, H., & Seppänen, M. (2025) · Bled eConference · doi:10.18690/um.fov.4.2025.33
IS User Behavior in the Age of Disruptions
Meier, M. (2025) · doi:10.20378/irb-108775
Self-determination theory and inertia in mHealth apps: drivers of continuous usage intentions
Gli, D. D., Odoom, R., Kosiba, J. P., Boateng, H., Ahiabor, D. K., & Tweneboah‐Koduah, E. Y. (2025) · International Journal of Spa and Wellness · doi:10.1080/24721735.2025.2580802
“…effect of the status quo bias theory on various user behaviours in relation to status quo change, including adopting and using a new technology (Polites & Karahanna, 2012), not adopting a new technology (Cham et al., 2022), switching to a new mobile payment service (Hsieh, 2021), and upgrading…”
InfluentialModel of Blockchain Resistance in Cryptocurrency Retail Investor
Handoko, B. L., Sundjaja, A. M., & Warganegara, D. L. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Design (ICCED) · doi:10.1109/icced68324.2025.11324824
“Similarly, Polites and Karahanna [17] found that users tend to remain shackled to the status quo when faced with high switching costs.”
Factors Influencing Blockchain Resistance in Financial Auditor Profession
Handoko, B. L., Heykal, M., & Deniswara, K. (2025) · International Conference on Computer System, Information Technology, and Electrical Engineering (COSITE) · doi:10.1109/cosite68330.2025.11414362
“According to research by Choi et al. [23], the uncertain cost of blockchain implementation can hinder support and commitment from the management team [20].”
Guynup, C., Nguyen, H., Basappa, R., André, K., Yancey, M., Flathmann, C., McNeese, N. J., Toxtli, C., Madathil, K. C., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA) · doi:10.1109/cogsima68896.2026.11481227
“Additionally, barriers such as cultural resistance [21], organizational inertia [22], and financial limitations [23] hinder this adoption.”
Adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Mixed-Methods ApproachPreprint
Li, S., Guo, J., & Chen, X. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9704769/v1
Beyond the prompt: understanding ChatGPT outcomes through the lens of IT identity
Godinho, S., Oliveira, T., & das Neves, C. P. P. C. (2026) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-11-2025-1155
A Multi-Dimensional View of IS Discontinuance: Insights Using Socio-Technical Systems
Ghelani, S., & Pandey, V. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10808-1
Kreimer, D., Stoppacher, L., Hauser, W., Foscht, T., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2026) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-026-01205-w
Xun, Y., Zheng, X., Lee, M., & Yang, F. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2734053
Wiranugraha, A. D., Wijayanto, H. W., Setyawan, E., Ulya, M. Z., & Nurin, Y. M. (2026) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2026.2736909
Joshi, R., & Sharda, P. (2026) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-02-2025-0039
Sharma, R. (2026) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/er-10-2025-0901
Antecedents of multidimensional inertia toward self-service technology
Kwon, J., & Ahn, J. (2026) · Total Quality Management & Business Excellence · doi:10.1080/14783363.2026.2744871
Min, C., Qin, X., Wang, Y., Ziyi, L., & Ru, X. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2749338
Alshaher, A. A., & Ali, M. (2026) · Innovation & Management Review · doi:10.1108/inmr-10-2025-0252
Chen, X., Guo, N., & Li, Q. (2026) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2026.2750452
Travel Time Estimation on Urban Arterials - a Real Time Aspect
Wu, J. (2016) · Minds at UW (University of Wisconsin)
Khor, P. H., Wahab, N. D. M. A., & Lim, K. C. (2021) · UiTM Institutional Repositories (Universiti Teknologi MARA)
Users' Willingness to Provide Information Requirements for Systems Development
Appan, R., Browne, G. J., & Madhavaram, S. (2022) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3514097.3514103
Upgrading of academic database: acceptance or resistance
Lian, H., Huang, Z., Zhou, J., & Qin, Q. (2021) · World Symposium on Software Engineering (WSSE) · doi:10.1145/3488838.3488853
Understanding Social Network Discontinuance Through the Lens of Turnover Theory
(2025) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/2_iis_133
Digital transformation: an analysis of opportunities for retailers
Reid, S. A. (2023) · Technische Universität Dortmund Eldorado (Technische Universität Dortmund) · doi:10.17877/de290r-24430
Designing for Adoption Management: Opening the Black Box of Mandatory Software Use
Falch, C. C. (2025) · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen)
User Resistance Behaviors Towards Smart Tourism Applications: A Configurational Model Approach
Chung, C., Park, M., & Chung, N. (2025) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Digital Municipal Service System
Imtiaz, N. (2024) · Theseus (Ammattikorkeakoulujen)
Goplen, H. S. (2018) · BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))
Arisman, A. (2023) · Repository at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)
The Impact of Digitalisation on Status Quo Bias: A Longitudinal Study
Niranga, M. (2025) · Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) · doi:10.25918/thesis.531
Talus, P. (2024) · Doria (University of Helsinki)
Meliana, N. L. A., & Darma, G. S. (2025) · Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change · doi:10.64753/jcasc.v10i4.3296
Exploring user switching intention to central bank digital currency payments
Li, C., Tee, L.-T., Kew, S.-R., & Li, C. (2026) · The Economics and Finance Letters · doi:10.18488/29.v13i1.4741
Ali, S. B. (2025) · Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University)
Nomological Network of Turnover in the Portuguese Military Context
Batista, J. C. A. (2026) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Kondrateva, G. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/d3761f02zb4eaz4d25z9e3dzda8ca16fb5b1
L'efficacité d’usage du big data en entreprise en contexte arménien
Grigoryan, E. (2022) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e9c44609z6743z4825z9472z557455ea255c
La gestion de la dette technique dans le cadre des pratiques DevOps
Kanita, N. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/e6c30d90z3b9az472fz87d8zbab1b7672635
Feature evaluation, trade-offs, and WTP in music streaming services: a conjoint analysis approach
Stefano, C. D. (2026) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Andika, A., Putri, W. H., & Anisah, T. N. (2026) · Revista Galega de Economía · doi:10.15304/rge.35.1.10996
Resignation and Strategic Retention: Shaping the Future Workforce
(2026) · Frontiers research topics · doi:10.3389/978-2-8325-8131-5
Firdaus, T. A., Yuniaristanto, Y., & Damayanti, R. W. (2026) · Ranah Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development · doi:10.38035/rrj.v8i4.2137
Irwin, A. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7135698
Ramadeen, Y. (2026) · Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town)
Integration of the S-O-R model and dedication–constraint mechanisms: Over-the-top platform vidio
Dinary, T. I., & Setyowardhani, H. (2025) · Linkage · doi:10.61511/linkage.v3i1.2026.3994
Gendered Push-Pull-Mooring: Investigating E-Wallet Switching Intention in Indonesia
Pradana, D. B., Kusnayain, Y. I., Rahmansyah, A. M., Bachtiar, A. M., & Yohana, H. I. (2026) · Sharia Economic and Management Business Journal (SEMBJ) · doi:10.62159/sembj.v7i3.2614
Duong, Q., THANH, T. N., ANH, V. H. D., NHAT, H. P., & TIEN, T. H. (2026) · Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science- Economics and Business Administration · doi:10.46223/hcmcoujs.econ.en.16.11.5404.2026
Nyazabe, S., Lee, C. H., & Han, S. H. (2026) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Trust, privacy, and habit in retail central bank digital currency adoption among the unbanked
Achebe, S., & Mansour, L. (2026) · Digital Enterprise Studies · doi:10.68217/gsvzcf27
สุขภาพ คือ ความมั่งคั่งระยะยาว
Homla-Or, N. (2023) · Journal of Roi Kaensarn Academi
Gillgren, S. J. (2026) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Don’t Just Do Something, Sit There! Decisiveness as a Product of Mindfulness and Acceptance Traits
Anderson, C. J., & Lynn, S. J. (2026) · Imagination Cognition and Personality · doi:10.1177/02762366261492677
Mandal, S., Kar, A. K., & Gupta, S. (2026) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-026-10821-4
Kim, N., Chung, M., Jones-Jang, S. M., Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2744841
Zhou, Z., Lin, Y., Chen, Q., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, K., & Wang, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1877044
Power in IT Renewal: How Power Dynamics Shape the Trajectory of Large-Scale System Replacements
Grasmeijer, R., Elshan, E., & van den Hooff, B. (n.d.) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
关, 琳. (2026) · Hans Journal of Data Mining · doi:10.12677/hjdm.2026.164016
From TCP/IP to MCP: Security and Governance Lessons from Internet Protocols for Agentic AIPreprint
Bucknall, B., Byrley, A., & Hammond, L. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.26624
Disentangling Mechanisms of Elderly People's Resistance to AI-Enabled Robots
Zhao, B., Ding, B., Li, S., & Guo, Z. (2026) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.425375
Decision heuristics for AI-enabled CRM in Finnish banking sector
DONA, O. M. A. (2026) · Jyväskylä University Digital Archive (University of Jyväskylä)
Qi, X., Fan, L., & Wu, F. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-75461-9
Xian, X., Guo, X., & Guo, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1893830
Lee, C., & Kim, K. (2026) · Asian Journal of Technology Innovation · doi:10.1080/19761597.2026.2755040
Fan, X., & Zhao, X. (2026) · Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1080/10941665.2026.2741278
Metadata
- Authors
- Polites, G. L., & Karahanna, E.
- Affiliations
- Bucknell University (US)
- University of Georgia (US)
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2012-03-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W4401611614
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- technology adoption, status quo bias, habit, inertia, switching costs, sunk costs, resistance to change, technology acceptance, perceived ease of use, relative advantage, intention to use, subjective norms, normative pressure, cognitive consistency, psychological commitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review