The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversal of drug resistance in human tumor xenografts by 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine-induced demethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter
Open accessAbstract
Loss of DNA mismatch repair because of hypermethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter occurs at a high frequency in a number of human tumors. A role for loss of mismatch repair (MMR) in resistance to a number of clinically important anticancer drugs has been shown. We have investigated whether the demethylating agent 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine (DAC) can be used in vivo to sensitize MMR-deficient, drug-resistant ovarian (A2780/cp70) and colon (SW48) tumor xenografts that are MLH1 negative because of gene promoter hypermethylation. Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with the demethylating agent DAC at a nontoxic dose induces MLH1 expression. Re-expression of MLH1 is associated with a decrease in hMLH1 gene promoter methylation. DAC treatment alone has no effect on the growth rate of the tumors. However, DAC treatment sensitizes the xenografts to cisplatin, carboplatin, temozolomide, and epirubicin. Sensitization is comparable with that obtained by reintroduction of the hMLH1 gene by chromosome 3 transfer. Consistent with loss of MMR having no effect on sensitivity in vitro to Taxol, DAC treatment has no effect on the Taxol sensitivity of the xenografts. DAC treatment does not sensitize xenografts of HCT116, which lacks MMR because of hMLH1 mutation. Because there is emerging data on the role of loss of MMR in clinical drug resistance, DAC could have a role in increasing the efficacy of chemotherapy for patients whose tumors lack MLH1 expression because of hMLH1 promoter methylation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
In Vitro Reactivation of the FMR1 Gene Involved in Fragile X Syndrome
Chiurazzi, P., Pomponi, M. G., Willemsen, R., Oostra, B. A., & Neri, G. (1998) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/7.1.109 · Cited by 198
Cited by
The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy
Kelland, L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2167 · Cited by 4,717
Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy
Egger, G., Liang, G., Aparicio, A., & Jones, P. A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02625 · Cited by 3,232
Drug resistance in cancer: An overview
Housman, G., Byler, S., Heerboth, S., Lapinska, K., Longacre, M., Snyder, N., & Sarkar, S. (2014) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers6031769 · Cited by 2,463
DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy
Helleday, T., Petermann, E., Lundin, C., Hodgson, B., & Sharma, R. A. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2342 · Cited by 1,666
Das, P. M., & Singal, R. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2004.07.151 · Cited by 1,456
Metadata
- Authors
- Plumb, J. A., Strathdee, G. R., Sludden, J., Kaye, S. B., & Brown, R. E.
- Venue
- PubMed
- Publisher
- National Institutes of Health
- Published
- 2000-12-31
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6039-44
- OpenAlex
- W1546270188
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversal of drug resistance in human tumor xenografts by 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine-induced demethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.25405/ncl.34284429
- The paper
- Plumb, J. A., Strathdee, G. R., Sludden, J., Kaye, S. B., & Brown, R. E. (2000). Reversal of drug resistance in human tumor xenografts by 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine-induced demethylation of the hMLH1 gene promoter. PubMed. https://doi.org/10.25405/ncl.34284429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.