PreprintCited by 1Computational Drug Discovery MethodsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchPhytochemicals and Medicinal Plants

Free Energy Landscapes and Residue Network Analysis for Six SARS-CoV-2 Targets in Complex with Plausible Phytochemical Inhibitors from Withania Somnifera: 1 µS Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Open access
Parida, Pratap Kumar, Paul, Dipak, Chakravorty, Debamitra·2021·ChemRxiv

Abstract

The pandemic is here to stay- evident from the second wave that is severely affecting global population. Though vaccination is now available, the population size restricts its efficacy, especially in the third world countries. Therefore, to avoid a third wave, natural preventive therapeutics are the need of the hour. In this work the efficiency of phytochemicals from Withania somnifera to bind to a total of six SARS-CoV-2 targets have been shown.1 µs molecular dynamics simulations and essential dynamic analyses shed light on the changes induced by the phytochemicals and highlights their multipotent capabilities- 27-Hydroxywithanolide B was able to bind to three targets. Relative free energy of binding for all the phytochemicals were calculated by MM/PBSA. Minimum energy structures were extracted from their free energy landscapes and were subjected to PSN-ENM-NMA and network centrality analysis. Results showed that the phytochemical binding changes the residue-residue interaction network. Network communities increase while hubs and links decrease. Metapath rewiring occurs through residues Phe456 in spike protein, Thr26 and Tyr118 in main protease, Val49 and Phe156 in NSP3, Leu98 in NSP9, Leu4345 in NSP10, Phe440 and Phe843 in NSP12. This work tries to understand the mechanism of possible inhibition by the phytochemicals to combat SARS-CoV-2 with their capability of targeting multiple proteins. The insight from this study can be of great relevance to explore the changes in network properties induced by reported potential inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2 targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv.14499306.v1

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parida, P. K., Paul, D., & Chakravorty, D.
Affiliations
Novel Techsciences (OPC) Private Limited
Venue
ChemRxiv
Published
2021-04-28
ISSN
2573-2293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3157516877
Cited by
0
References
77
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, Withania somnifera, phytochemical inhibitors, free energy landscape, residue interaction networks, network centrality, spike protein, main protease, NSP3, nsp9, nsp10, nsp12, MM-PBSA binding free energy, essential dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review