Cited by 176Traffic Prediction and Management TechniquesAir Quality Monitoring and ForecastingData Management and Algorithms

Geospatial data to images: a deep-learning framework for traffic forecasting

Open access
Jiang, Weiwei, Zhang, Lin·2019·Tsinghua Science and Technology

Abstract

Traffic forecasting has been an active research field in recent decades, and with the development of deep-learning technologies, researchers are trying to utilize deep learning to achieve tremendous improvements in traffic forecasting, as it has been seen in other research areas, such as speech recognition and image classification. In this study, we summarize recent works in which deep-learning methods were applied for geospatial data-based traffic forecasting problems. Based on the insights from previous works, we further propose a deep-learning framework, which transforms geospatial data to images, and then utilizes the state-of-the-art deep-learning methodologies such as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and residual networks. To demonstrate the simplicity and effectiveness of our framework, we present a formulation of the New York taxi pick-up/drop-off forecasting problem, and show that our framework significantly outperforms traditional methods, including Historical Average (HA) and AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26599/tst.2018.9010033

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. A. Graves and J. Schmidhuber, Offline handwriting recognition with multidimensional recurrent neural networks, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Hyatt Regency, Canada, 2009, pp. 545-552.
  2. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville, Deep Learning. MIT Press, 2016.
  3. S, Hochreiter and J, Schmidhuber, Long short-term memory, Neural Computation, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735- 1780, 1997.
  4. Theano Development Team, Theano: A Python framework for fast computation of mathematical expressions, https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.02688, 2016. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jiang, W., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
Tsinghua Science and Technology
Published
2019-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
52-64
ISSN
1007-0214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899619587
Cited by
176
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 3
FWCI
11.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Tsinghua Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Data Management and Algorithms
Keywords
traffic prediction, geospatial data, convolutional neural networks, ResNet, deep learning framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review