Una comparación de los centros imperiales incas de tomebamba y caranqui: ¿cambios de latitud, cambios de actitud?
Open accessAbstract
La zona más septentrional del Tawantinsuyu, que constituyó la frontera imperial a finales delsiglo XV, corresponde al actual país del Ecuador. Aunque fue el último sector en incorporarseal imperio, la región y su gente jugaron un papel destacado en la historia del imperio inca,particularmente para el último gobernante indiscutible, Huayna Cápac y su hijo Atahualpa. Eneste artículo, ofrezco una mirada comparativa a la arqueología de los centros imperiales realesde Tomebamba y Caranqui, reflexionando sobre la ubicación de los sitios en el contexto delpaisaje local, los elementos arquitectónicos presentes y la disposición física de cada uno. Aunquelos dos sitios representan momentos diferentes en la historia del avance inca hacia el norte, sucomparación sirve para iluminar cómo las estrategias materiales del Imperio pueden haber sidoempaquetadas, secuenciadas y modificadas para adaptarse a las circunstancias locales.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- L. Bray, T.
- Venue
- Antropología Cuadernos De Investigación
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 173-190
- ISSN
- 1390-4256 (ISSN-L)
- 2631-2506
- OpenAlex
- W4402973824
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-sa
- Locations
- Antropología Cuadernos de investigación (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Historical and Architectural Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
- Keywords
- Inca Empire, Atahualpa, Huayna Capac, Ecuador, Inca architecture, material strategies, imperial frontier
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
