Cited by 80Human-Animal Interaction StudiesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

How Dogs Influence the Evaluation of Psychotherapists

Schneider, Margaret S., Harley, Lorah Pilchak·2006·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Research has shown that the presence of a companion animal reduces anxiety, encourages interaction among humans and enhances the way in which people are perceived. These are all effects which would be useful in a psychotherapeutic setting. On this basis the current study investigated the effect of the presence of a dog on the way in which people perceive psychotherapists. The study utilized an experimental design in which participants viewed a videotape of one of two therapists who were either with or without a dog. It was hypothesized that people would respond more positively to the psychotherapists when accompanied by a dog; specifically, that they would be more generally satisfied and would be more willing to disclose personal information, and that these effects would be influenced by attitudes towards pets. The first two hypotheses were confirmed. The effect was most pronounced among those who were the least positive toward the psychotherapist, demonstrating a ceiling effect. Contrary to the last hypothesis, attitudes toward pets had no influence on the perceptions of psychotherapists. History of pet ownership had only minimal impact on the results. Practical applications and directions for further research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/089279306785593784

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schneider, M. S., & Harley, L. P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Schneider, Margaret S.
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2006-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
128-142
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W2038507508
Cited by
80
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
dogs, psychotherapists, consumer perception, client satisfaction, personal information disclosure, pet ownership, human-animal interaction, therapeutic relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review